On the evening of 12 and 10, the finals of the National College Students' Tax Debate Competition with the theme of "Youth Dreams, Tax Strives" ended successfully in Beijing. Eight debating teams selected from eight national competition areas gathered in Beijing, and their wisdom collided and they staged a wonderful peak confrontation. After three days of fierce competition, the team of Xi Jiaotong University made it through all the way and finally won the national finals. Lou Jiwei, Minister of Finance, Qin Yizhi, First Secretary of the Secretariat of the Communist Youth League Central Committee, Wang Jun, Director of State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China, Deputy Director of CCTV, Deputy Director State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China, Qiu, Fan Jian, Chief Accountant Sun Ruibiao and Chief Auditor watched the championship battle that night and presented awards to the winners and organizations.
The National College Student Tax Debate Competition is jointly sponsored by the General Office of State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China, People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Central School Department of the Communist Youth League. Since the start of the competition in September this year, the competition has lasted for nearly three months, and * * * has attracted more than 70 universities from all over the country to participate, making it the largest national debate competition this year. The competition closely follows the hot topics of China's current economy and taxation, and focuses on taxation, reform and people's livelihood. There has been an upsurge of learning and understanding taxation on university campuses all over the country, which has also aroused widespread concern and participation from all walks of life.
This competition is divided into eight divisions: Beijing, Shanghai, Dalian, Wuhan, Nanjing, Xi, Chengdu and Guangzhou. Under the careful organization of the local tax authorities and the Communist Youth League Committee of * * *, the debate was brilliant and bright. By the end of 10, after dozens of wonderful matchups, the quarter-finals of the debate were produced. Hebei University, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Dalian Maritime University, Xi 'an Jiaotong University, Nanjing Audit University, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Sichuan University, Jinan University, from February 8, 65438 to February 8, 10, eight teams came by dream, and the fierce confrontation on the field was not felt at all. The debaters quoted classics and gave the audience an audio-visual feast. The debaters' extensive knowledge, strict logic and quick response have also won universal praise. After six fierce battles in 1/4 finals and semi-finals, teams from Xi Jiaotong University and Zhongnan University of Economics and Law won the championship and entered the battle of kings.
10 that night, in the studio of Starlight Studios, the venue was full of passion. Debaters have had a heated debate on whether it is better to expand the scope of personal income tax reform or narrow the scope of collection. In a rage, the two sides broke the offensive and defensive, causing cheers and applause from the audience. In the end, Xi Jiaotong University won the national finals, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law won the runner-up, and Hebei University and Dalian Maritime University tied for third place. Eight teams, including Xue, stood out and participated in the national finals on behalf of their respective divisions.
In the national finals, the competition specifications continued to heat up. The organizing committee invited Gao Peiyong, president of the National Institute of Economic Strategy, Liu Jianwen, a professor at Peking University Law School, Zhu Qing, a professor at Renmin University of China, Dong Mingzhu, chairman of Gree Electric Co., Ltd., Shi Shusi, director of the editorial department of the Workers' Daily Social Weekly, Meng Man, an associate professor at the School of History and Culture of Minzu University of China, and Zhou Xuanyi, an associate professor at the School of Philosophy of Wuhan University, as judges, to comment on the performance of the debate, analyze tax hotspots, help the audience interpret tax laws and regulations, and grade the participating teams.
In order to make the activities more thoughtful and interesting, in the last three competitions, after the debater debate session, Professor Hu from Tianjin University of Finance and Economics and Professor Hu from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics respectively represented the pros and cons, and conducted expert debates on the spot to explain the debate topics from a professional perspective.
In the competition, the debaters fought on the stage, the experts fought under the stage, the judges commented, and the audience voted outside ... A college student tax debate went to the society and the public. The national college students' tax debate competition has achieved good results through the way of "tax setting, singing opera in colleges and universities, and expert comments". Since the start of the Debate Competition, publicity columns have been set up in 76 official website, 32 official website Youth League Committees and more than 70 participating universities and colleges in China. Major mainstream media reported the competition, eight provincial TV stations recorded the video of the competition, and online media such as Xinhuanet and China Tax Network, as well as emerging media such as WeChat and Weibo conducted all-round three-dimensional publicity. This newspaper also made a continuous follow-up report on this competition.
In the past three months, youth, dreams and taxes have become three hot words in society. The wonderful confrontation between more than 70 colleges and universities in the eight major divisions not only made everyone feel the rapid ideological collision and speculative charm, but also stimulated the attention and thinking of all walks of life on taxation, promoted the tax law to enter the campus and society, and promoted and promoted the taxpayers to improve their compliance with the tax law.
;