Therefore, if your goal is the public examination, then don't consider taking the postgraduate entrance examination, but suggest taking the examination of village officials-although this thing is chicken ribs, you won't delay the public examination during your three-year term, and you do have a discount for the public examination after the end of one term. In addition, if you have a background or strong ability, you still have the opportunity to directly choose "minor course" (this is an automatic civil servant! )
However, if your goal is to take the postgraduate entrance examination, then taking the examination of village officials is by no means like an "ant tribe"-there is no comparison between the review environment and the atmosphere of the school.
The relevant "care policy" of the postgraduate entrance examination or public examination will definitely have an accurate deadline, and generally it will stipulate that "you will pass the expiration before a certain month", so it must be several months to one year after the expiration.
Finally, the first two questions. In recent one or two years, the threshold of the village official examination has been raised, and the popularity has declined (mainly because our forerunner has been breached by the government), so the difficulty (in fact, the admission ratio) should be slightly lower than ours. There is almost no "absolute fairness" in this world, but the village official exam is actually serious, at least it can be regarded as "relative fairness".
Working hours are relatively uncertain. Generally speaking, the requirement is "5 plus 2, white plus black", but there is not much work that can actually be done, so "working time" is mostly killing time. So the review time is enough, but the quality is difficult to guarantee (the environment is generally chaotic)