Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - Why is pedagogy so discriminated against in universities? I feel at the bottom of the chain of contempt.
Why is pedagogy so discriminated against in universities? I feel at the bottom of the chain of contempt.
In other words, the contempt chain of general comprehensive colleges (usually colleges with dominant science and engineering) is like this ~

Ace majors despise engineering majors, engineering majors despise science majors, science majors despise humanities and social sciences majors, and humanities and social sciences majors despise art majors.

In fact, this is the same as most high school students are science students who despise liberal arts students. It seems that as long as you study liberal arts, it means that you admit that your brain is not easy to use and your IQ can't keep up, so you can only study mathematics and physics. Parents often advise children who want to study liberal arts "don't study liberal arts, it's only for children who can't learn well." . . . . .

Pedagogy has a similar experience in universities. Because the requirements for mathematics are relatively low, many liberal arts students have not been exposed to mathematics and physics for many years, and what they have learned is often misunderstood by science and engineering students as just reciting, with no technical content. So nature is often despised.

Fortunately, there is also a chain of contempt within pedagogy ~ ~ Girls who study education despise boys who study education ~ ~ Haha ~ ~ The implied logic may be that girls think I am stupid because I am a girl, and I am quite cute, and boys study education because I am stupid, hehe, I despise you ~

But in fact, pedagogy is a knowledge that is easy to learn but difficult to master. I don't think there is any need to say how important a country's education is. So I still call on you to correct the name of pedagogy.