When the dust of 2 1 postgraduate entrance examination settled, when many students have received or will receive the transfer documents from colleges and universities, the translation major of Shanghai Normal University was like a bolt from the blue! More than 30 students who have been admitted have been disqualified! On May 2 1 day, translation candidates from Shanghai Normal University broke the news. On the same day, about 30 candidates on the proposed admission list received a phone call and were told to cancel the admission qualification. The reason given by the school is-missing the question. However, candidates and schools hold different opinions. Because the whole re-examination is recorded and recorded, the exchange of topics is after the re-examination is completed, and the re-examination topics are randomly selected, so the disclosure of topics cannot lead to factual results. The cause of this incident is reporting, just like the National People's Congress's cancellation of admission qualifications.

Informants are obviously becoming more and more "persistent". He stayed in Shanghai for many days, reported many times, and prepared chat records and screenshots. Si Mazhao's heart is well known. On May 24th, Shanghai Normal University re-released the proposed admission list, recruiting 80 translators and publicizing 40 people. In fact, the school announced the proposed admission list for the first time on March 29th. According to the time of the second publicity 10 days, the time for the first publicity of the admission list has passed, which is also the key point that candidates hope the school will respond to-because the publicity period has passed, it has not been produced during the period.

Coincidentally, on April 7, on the day of the re-examination of the National People's Congress, many candidates were accused of sharing the re-examination questions in the postgraduate entrance examination group, resulting in more than 20 candidates, including the first place in the initial examination, being awarded 0 points in the re-examination. Although both schools stopped handling the report after receiving it, compared with the handling by Shanghai Normal University, the NPC not only ensured the fairness of the results, but also ensured the fairness of the procedures. What is consequential justice? What is procedural justice? The result is justice, that is, the wicked (or good deeds) will be rewarded with evil, and the wicked (or evil deeds) will be rewarded with evil. From the point of view of result justice, these students should be punished by canceling the re-examination admission qualification of normal university. Procedural justice, which is regarded as "visible justice", is explained in the simplest language, that is, the case should not only be judged correctly, fairly and completely in line with the rules, but also make people feel fair and reasonable in the process of judging.

The most criticized thing about this disposal of Shanghai Normal University is the disqualification of candidates after the publicity period. When the proposed admission list is publicized successfully, it is clear that the legitimacy of the list has been recognized by the school. The disposal method of Shanghai Normal University only deleted the publicity in March and stopped the publicity again. It is ridiculous to handle this matter with an inhuman high attitude without stopping any clarification or giving any explanation to the candidates.

Based on this, candidates put forward the following doubts: 1. When the National People's Congress dealt with the re-examination questions, the school stopped communicating, investigating and confirming the candidates, ensured that the defendant was the wrong party, and persuaded them, while Shanghai Normal University failed to communicate and confirm with the candidates and sentenced both parties to death. 2. At the joint point where the publicity has been completed and the file transfer letter has been issued, the whole proposed admission process will suddenly cancel the proposed admission qualification if it meets the rules. Can a school that makes its own rules abide by them? 3. 57 people in the group said the title, but in the end more than 30 candidates were disqualified. Can we just listen to the whistleblower's side of the story without stopping the comprehensive investigation, and this incident is not as open as the National People's Congress and does not conform to the rules.

Although this incident seems to guarantee justice, it does ravage procedural justice. This is also the problem of the Shanghai Normal University incident. The investigation, evidence collection and results publicity of the report are all in a state of "three questions don't know". How can people believe that you really guarantee justice? In our culture, the results of justice are more heroes, such as "robbing the rich to help the poor" and "doing justice for heaven", but it is neither heroic nor just to go to Normal University this time. It will only be ridiculous to pretend to be crazy! The usual postgraduate entrance examination is, to a great extent, an information war plus experience war. When things between the National People's Congress and Normal University are in full swing, Kangkang, I think candidates should sum up their experience in time to avoid such problems:

First of all, we should be a little careful about all the fellow students who compete in the same school. There are thousands of people in Qian Qian, but people don't know their faces. Friends, although the world is wonderful, people's hearts are often harsh, so we must be alert! Secondly, consolidate your talents, rely on yourself better than others, and put an end to any idea of taking a title. This is the truth. Finally, due to the improper handling of normal university, I hope it can assume the proper character of a school, stop disclosing the whole thing and make compensation to the candidates. Yes, because of its procedural mistakes and omissions, it has caused irreparable losses to candidates, and it can't be made up by an apology!