Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University ranking - How to achieve good results in the "internet plus" College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition
How to achieve good results in the "internet plus" College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition
The selection of "internet plus" College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition (hereinafter referred to as "Great Innovation Competition") is done manually by the jury, so we must first have a certain understanding of the composition and characteristics of the jury.

Evaluation criteria and evaluation process

One of the core factors of evaluation: judges

Composition of judges

The jury of the provincial competition is composed of representatives from investment circles, business circles and universities, with a ratio of about 3/3/3;

90% of the judges in the online evaluation stage of the national competition come from the investment and business circles;

More than 99% of the judges in the final stage of the national competition came from the investment and business circles.

This shows that in the whole process of the big creative competition, the judges from the investment and business circles account for the majority, that is, whether the participating projects are promoted or not, the investment and business circles have the right to speak.

█: So what do the judges in the investment and business circles think of this project?

The judges will judge the project mainly from the two directions of "creativity" and "practice" to see whether the team is only in the creative stage or has landed or has a specific implementation plan. For example, for projects that are already in operation, the jury will consider the sustainable growth of the project to see if there is an upper limit on the growth of the enterprise.

█ Comments:

Whether it is a creative group or a start-up and growth group, the core of the project content is that the sparrow is small and complete, but it is not an idea, an invention or the result of a laboratory.

The team should think about the market, technology, products, team, performance and planning of the project, and conduct self-examination to know the shortcomings of the project.

█ The materials needed for the Great Creation Competition include WORD and PPT business plans and videos, so how should these three materials be prepared differently?

Whether it is the provincial competition or the online evaluation stage of the 600 120 national competition, the judges need to select high-quality projects from a large number of business plans. If the judges have questions about the project, they will usually open the PPT version of the business plan first, and then open the WORD version of the business plan. Therefore, the WORD version of the business plan is mainly used as the project "filing" for future reference, and the judges mainly look at the team's PPT version of the business plan.

Teams entering the online evaluation stage of the National Games should pay attention to the fact that the submitted PPT business plan is submitted to the judges for reading online, so the content should be comprehensive and information points should not be missed, but the length should not be too long. The content of the plan should be organized so that the judges can find the information they want to see in a short time.

However, the PPT business plan at the site of the National Games is different from the online evaluation stage of the National Games. The speech with the roadshow is to demonstrate PPT, and the content does not need to be written in PPT. PPT is more used as an outline of the speech. The speaker should pay attention to highlight the key points on the basis of comprehensive introduction of the project, such as why you can do better than others and what are your distinctive core competitiveness.

Above, according to the content of the promotion meeting "How to Get Good Results in the Great Creation Competition".