Warning is an administrative punishment, informed criticism is not a punishment. Warning punishment should be recorded in personal files, but informed criticism doesn't have to be recorded in personal files. As a punishment, the warning may be revoked. There is no question of revocation in informed criticism. As a punishment, the parties have the right to make statements and defend themselves. However, informed criticism is not a punishment, and probably doesn't even have a chance to defend himself.

brief introduction

Informed criticism is actually a combination of two concepts: notification and criticism. "Notice" means that the higher authorities notify the lower authorities or their internal employees of the relevant information in writing.

And "criticism" refers to the opinions put forward on shortcomings and mistakes, with the aim of hoping that the other party will learn a lesson and take it as a warning.

From this point of view, informed criticism in a broad sense refers to a measure that the subject announces the shortcomings and mistakes of the actor within a certain range, hoping that the actor or others can learn from them and take them as a warning. Here, the subject of informed criticism's implementation is uncertain, which can be a company, an administrative organ or an organization, such as informed criticism, where the party organization violates party discipline.