Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - Please give an example to illustrate that "strict entry and lenient exit" in universities is more beneficial than "lenient entry and strict exit".
Please give an example to illustrate that "strict entry and lenient exit" in universities is more beneficial than "lenient entry and strict exit".
Category: Education/Science >> University Information

Problem description:

The more examples, the more detailed the better. This is the topic of our debate. We need information badly. Thank you.

Analysis:

Relatively reduce the cost of university education. Because too many students enter the university, the students in the university are mixed, and the students' academic performance is uneven, which makes the teacher more troublesome in teaching. If the level of students is relatively balanced, teachers can appropriately broaden their knowledge according to the level of students when imparting knowledge in class.

Relatively ease the employment pressure. College students all think they are favored by heaven, and it is inevitable that they will look down on their jobs after graduation. Yan Jin's generous education method cultivates real elites. Supplemented by lenient entry and strict exit, vocational higher education should be increased, that is, after graduating from high school, some people enter universities to receive higher education, and some people enter vocational colleges to receive vocational education. This kind of diversion will make the majority of students have a clearer employment goal when they find a job after graduation, and their professional skills will be improved relatively. Here, we must pay attention to the complementarity of vocational higher education! Otherwise, the other party will catch the tail of "violating universal higher education".

Go back and summarize, and continue writing tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.