I don't know what kind of views can be counted as unexpected views of ordinary people, but I can only talk about my views on this topic.

The focus of the debate is not how good it is, but how to explain that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

The opposing party will certainly explain it from two aspects:

For college students, this has not gained much, because there is not enough time, you can use it to do other things, which means that it is wasted.

For local students, college students have no educational experience and impart knowledge in disorder. As soon as they find the state, they run out of time, which can only increase the academic burden of local students and is inefficient.

In view of the above point of view, the positive angle:

First of all, regardless of the length of time, this is an attempt, as long as it is a very meaningful practice for college students themselves. It can not only train their overall knowledge arrangement and language expression ability, but also train their mentality and communication ability. It can also make college students understand the hard work of teachers in the classroom, realize their own lack of knowledge system and ability, study harder and make continuous progress. In this way, we can also find out that college students who really love education will engage in the teaching profession in the future and enrich the educational resources in China. This is far from being compared with participating in other activities.

Secondly, for local students, the teaching methods of college students are more flexible, open and closer to the student groups. Perhaps the knowledge system is not clear, but the knowledge imparted is often impressive. It can also broaden the horizons of local students and is more conducive to their long-term learning path development.