As Godfrey said, "If the media can successfully focus on a certain issue, it can be used to set the agenda. They provide the background, which determines how people think about a topic and evaluate its value, and the media constructs the public agenda accordingly. [1] "When the context provided by the network deviates from the objective reality, people's thoughts will be restrained in a subtle way. For college students who frequently contact the Internet, hot events on the Internet will not only enrich their cognitive objects, but also greatly impact their values, especially the deliberately created negative topics, and the resulting negative effects are worthy of vigilance.
In the new media era, information is released more freely, but grandstanding and ambiguous events abound on the Internet, which can be seen from the annual "Top Ten Fake News" selection. In order to satisfy the curiosity of the audience, or for commercial marketing, journalistic professionalism gave way to consumerism. Once the network hot events in the context of "free" communication are mixed with false news or negative public opinion, it not only pollutes the network environment, but also disturbs the normal thinking of college students.