1, the emphasis of evaluation is different: 985,211focuses on the evaluation of universities, mainly according to their comprehensive strength; Double-first-class focuses on discipline evaluation. First, it depends on whether a university has several strong disciplines (majors), and then it mainly evaluates the strength of a university according to the comprehensive strength of disciplines.
2. Essentially different: there is overlap between 985 and 2 1 1 universities in China. For example, Zhejiang University and Nanjing University are both 985 universities and 21/universities; However, there will be no such problems in the double-first-class, and the characteristics of different schools will be fully considered, and there will be no overlap.
3. The funding subject and the list are different: 985, 2 1 1 are funded by schools, and the list is relatively fixed; Double first-class is subject funding, and the construction list is not fixed. It will introduce a competitive mechanism and make timely adjustments every five years as a construction cycle.