Specifically, the difference between the ancient philology of the Ancient Books Institute and the Chinese philology of the College of Literature.
First of all, ancient philology, which belongs to different disciplines, belongs to historical philology, while Chinese language belongs to a two disciplines under Chinese discipline. When you graduate in the future, the Institute of Ancient Books will have a master's degree in history, and the Institute of Philology will have a master's degree in literature (in fact, in terms of teachers, both of them almost think that the history and language of Jida belong to the Institute of Ancient Books of the College of Literature, which is just a research institution under the College of Literature).
Secondly, in the exam, it is different. The direction of Chinese philology is similar to that of linguistics, that is, 1 linguistics 2 modern Chinese and ancient Chinese, but the direction of ancient books is not these. He mainly put forward his own different propositions every year, but in recent years, China's ancient philology is mainly an outline of China's ancient philology.
In terms of employment, both of them are relatively cold. If you want to do research in this field in the future, you'd better read your doctor and go to research institutes, universities and other places to do research. The scope of employment is relatively narrow. If you choose this major, you'd better have the idea of sitting on the bench and be mentally prepared. Its application is relatively not very good.
The above is my personal opinion. Please forgive me if I am not too strict.