The debate competition aims to enrich students' after-school life, enliven the campus atmosphere, open up their minds, reflect the energetic and positive mental state of college students, and explore and cultivate debate talents. What summative compositions did college students write after participating in the debate? The following is a summary essay carefully arranged by me for you. Let's have a look.
Summary essay of college students' debate competition —— The freshman cup debate competition in our college is my first time to participate in the debate competition. During the whole activity, I became familiar with the debate process, and my personal expression ability and adaptability were greatly improved.
First of all, in the preliminary round, what is the topic I drew? Is the market economy conducive to the development of morality? I made a 2-minute presentation and listed various examples from a positive perspective. Although there was some confusion in the presentation process, my self-introduction should have achieved good results and won the recognition of the judges.
After being selected successfully, shall we take two students as a group? Free men talk? The way to participate in the semi-finals What is the title of my painting? Cooperation is more important than competition in today's world? . I always agree? Peace and development are the themes of today's world? Therefore, I have more confidence in getting this topic. Therefore, in the process of the semi-finals, I actively thought and rejected the views of the other students with very confident language. The whole process went smoothly, and I advanced to the final with the sixth place.
The final is the key link of the debate, and a formal debate is needed, that is, three people choose the topic of the debate and have a complete debate with another group. What is the topic my group got? Knowledge poverty alleviation is more important than economic poverty alleviation? . Before the debate, we held many short meetings and carefully consulted some materials on poverty alleviation, and found that there were not many resources that were beneficial to us. So we have to be right? Poverty alleviation? The concept of "poverty-stricken countries" is defined by itself, and then some relevant ways of United Nations assistance to poor countries are referred to. But after playing in the end, maybe because it was the first game, the three of us were a little nervous, so we didn't play very well and didn't show the due effect. However, regardless of the outcome, the whole preparation process is worth remembering.
In the debate, I learned to cooperate with my classmates and prepare for the division of labor; In the debate, we can work together to refute our opponents. This kind of cooperation and team spirit is commendable. In this kind of debate, I also exercised my debating ability and accumulated rare experience to improve myself.
Of course, I just found many shortcomings in the debate, which also gave me a chance to improve. First of all, the ability of language organization needs to be strengthened, especially in the tense atmosphere of debate, it is easy to feel that the language is not fluent enough, even if there are arguments, there is no advantage. In addition, there is still much room for improvement in logical thinking ability. Every time you answer a question or ask a question, it is a process of logical thinking. Only by keeping clear logical thinking can we be invincible in the debate. I want to thank the college for giving us such an opportunity to exercise.
Summary composition of college students' debate contest 2 Mozi once said: Debaters in heaven will clearly distinguish right from wrong, judge the chaos of the century, distinguish similarities and differences, and examine the truth of name and reality. Handle the interest relationship and decide the suspect. ? Debate can make people distinguish right from wrong, stick to the truth and exercise their thinking ability. Through debate, people can better understand each other's positions and viewpoints, seek common ground while reserving differences, and achieve deeper psychological communication.
Our college participated in the 10th Debate Competition for College Students, with the ultimate goal of enriching campus life, strengthening the construction of study style and improving students' language expression ability and adaptability. The debating team is mainly composed of freshmen of grade 20 10, and is selected from freshmen of grade 120. After last semester's political debate, we have become a United and tacit team. After nearly two months of tempering from resurrection to the final, the runner-up is the best affirmation for us. The gains and losses of the university debate can be roughly described as follows.
First, the debater's debate level has improved.
Debate contest is a survey of students' eloquence, reaction, knowledge and psychological quality. The first is the breadth of knowledge. In the process of debate, eloquence and sensitivity are essential for debaters to gain the upper hand in the war of words, but more importantly, they have a wide range of knowledge. Knowledge is the foundation, with rich knowledge, you can be eloquent and quick-witted, and it is possible for soldiers to block the water. For this reason, every time seven students of the 20xx class debate team get it, they will read many papers related to the debate online and consult relevant materials in the library. In this process, our knowledge has also been broadened unconsciously, allowing us to play well on the field. Secondly, dialectical thinking ability. Defense is as important as offense in the debate. The so-called know yourself and know yourself. You can't just stay on the surface when analyzing the debate. We need dialectical thinking ability to go deep into it, not only to demonstrate our own views, but also to demonstrate the other's views. At this time, dialectical thinking is very important, just like two different selves arguing. Only in this way can we have a clearer understanding of the stadium. There are seven students in our college who have done very well in this respect. After they got the debate, they expressed their opinions and caused thinking in the debate. In the debate, the debater's thinking ability has also been greatly improved. Finally, psychological quality. Good psychological quality is very important in the debate. No matter how the other debater attacks, we must be able to hold our own various lines of defense, especially when the other party puts forward unexpected views. How to calm down and analyze flaws is essential. From current politics to junior college, seven people have also grown a lot in debates, big and small. It is inevitable to be nervous, but everyone has a good grasp of when and how to adjust their psychological state. As the saying goes, what matters is not the destination, but the scenery along the way. Although we were only runner-up in the end, the growth of this road was the' most beautiful scenery' we saw in the debate.
Second, improve students' discrimination ability.
The topic of each debate contest is the practical concern of college students. As far as the six topics debated in the college debate competition in our college are concerned, involving employment, environment, network, entertainment and other aspects, they have all become topics that our college students relish, and each student has a different view. As the saying goes? The more truth is argued, the clearer it becomes? In the discussion and debate on the debate field, students' ability to distinguish is also enhanced.
Third, the enhancement of team cohesion.
Our captain has a saying: We are not seven, we are not four, we are one. ? We are a whole, from being unfamiliar at first to becoming tacit teammates later. It is no exaggeration to say that whether it is four people on the field or seven people discussing together, sometimes the debaters sitting outside the field can prepare to debate what the next question will say, and the students on the field know more and more how to cooperate, how to foster strengths and avoid weaknesses, and how to fight the battlefield effectively. These are more and more in place in repeated cooperation. In addition to personal ability, the debate competition needs this team spirit. Only the tacit cooperation of four people can better defend and attack effectively. Of course, we also have some shortcomings.
1, language expression ability and Putonghua level need to be improved. In the final against Wenxinyuan, the strength of both sides is equal in various aspects such as debate, attack and debate, free debate, answering questions from the audience, summing up speeches and so on. However, we can't express the well-prepared materials clearly and clearly, and we can't unify our thoughts in language. Generally speaking, our thinking speed is higher than language expression. This kind of disharmony leads to our slight weakness in language organization, which is also one of the important reasons for our failure in the final.
2. The level of theoretical knowledge has improved, but it is still insufficient.
After the accumulation of many debates, searching for relevant information around each debate has improved our theoretical level a lot. We can talk and laugh whether we bring up related topics on or off the court, but at the same time, the other party will inevitably come up with new ideas unexpectedly. This theoretical knowledge just for the sake of debate is far from enough. Without in-depth, extensive and extensive theoretical knowledge, we can only simply respond to each other's views, but can't give a strong counterattack.
3. Poor psychological quality in the face of competition.
When competing with different opponents, although I can gain a good insight into my ability to argue with each other to adjust my mentality of how to look at the game, I am not adaptable to the whole debate environment. From politics to junior college, we experienced 10 games, but 8 games were held in the classroom where we often study, which was relatively adapted to the environment. But both finals were held in the international conference hall and lecture hall, facing more audiences and more professional judges than usual. The more you want to perform well, the more counterproductive it is, and your adaptability to the environment will drop significantly, and you will not be able to play your usual level.
Along the way, whether you succeed or fail, you can see your own strengths and weaknesses and face them with a correct attitude.
The road, always there, has no end. We believe that we can go on!
;