Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - I've been confused recently. Is the postgraduate entrance examination a good school or a school with a great major? I am interested in the information of Beihang University and Wuhan Institute of Tech
I've been confused recently. Is the postgraduate entrance examination a good school or a school with a great major? I am interested in the information of Beihang University and Wuhan Institute of Tech
I've been confused recently. Is the postgraduate entrance examination a good school or a school with a great major? I am interested in the information of Beihang University and Wuhan Institute of Technology. 1, there is only one principle about applying, choose what you love and love what you choose. No matter the difficulty of applying for a school, the intensity of competition, etc ... no one can be 100% sure which school he can go to. Finally, he will find that there is no substantial difference between Peking University and X University (the local university he is most sure of). Everyone needs the same input, the same effort and the same effort. Therefore, without enthusiasm and interest, it is difficult to persist. There is a place that I have dreamed of for a long time, and I try my best to get it, so no matter how bitter the days are, it will be sweet.

2. It is a question whether the tutor can be found or not. There are 1000 answers to the question of whether to find a tutor. Please treat it differently according to the specific situation. Generally speaking, you don't have to look for it for the first time. If there is no hard relationship, it is useless to find it. Cross-school cross-region, can't find it. Of course, if you are a student of our school and have a good relationship with your tutor, or you can give some hints, or the school you applied for has a bad reputation and a history of running cram schools, you'd better look for it. But please rest assured that these are very few, and most schools are basically based on justice. Moreover, the more transparent a prestigious school is, if you don't have any access, don't panic, just do what you should do. When we re-examined our major, no one contacted the tutor in advance (the students in our school only knew the tutor), and I didn't call myself, so I am glad that the postgraduate entrance examination system is gradually maturing.

As for English, if the score of CET-6 is above 70, please skip it, so don't waste time. It is said that English is the biggest obstacle to the postgraduate entrance examination. Every year, many martyrs are admitted to 380 but fail in English. I'm sorry. In fact, it is not difficult for you with poor English to get into the national line after half a year's hard work. First of all, the good news is that listening has been cancelled, which is the lowest part of the national average score every year. Then, you must know that if you want readers to win the world, you must take this as the biggest reason. Regarding English review, the most important recommendation is the real questions over the years. This is that essence of English review summarize by countless pioneers of postgraduate entrance examination. Based on this, do it repeatedly, especially in the reading part. In the words of the New Oriental teacher, "No word is new, and the grammatical components of no sentence are vague. When you see a topic, you must know which part of the article it comes from. This is called intensive reading. Read the real questions at least six times before the exam, because the principle of doing the questions every year is the same. For example, in the exam, you will have a very familiar feeling about the questioner's thinking and mode, and you will be handy. Even if you guess, the probability will be much greater. As for the popular reading articles of 280/220/200/ 100 in the world, if you have no energy, you don't have to read them. At most, it can be used as extensive reading material and read articles. There is no need to delve into the right or wrong of the topic, because it is still far from the real question. If you change your mind, that's too bad. As for English, I would also recommend the FLASH class in New Oriental, which will be available on all major BT websites. Listening to this class is the same as going to headquarters, saving money and time. The teachers in New Oriental are all humorous and easy to explain. Listening to their class will not doze off anyway, and it can cultivate your interest and confidence in English. It's really good. As for words, I only recommend one from New Oriental. The vocabulary of postgraduate entrance examination is less than that of band 6, and the number of exams is one or two thousand. But unlike CET-4 and CET-6, it examines the depth of a word. Usually, we only know the most common meaning of a word, but the second and third ... unusual meanings are often obtained in English for postgraduate entrance examination. The usage of words, the interpretation in a specific context, etc. All these require students to master every core vocabulary in depth. In short, regarding words, we should seek depth rather than more. Do a few simulation questions in the sprint stage, strictly abide by the time limit, mainly to feel the atmosphere, grasp your own speed, and see how you should allocate your time. Every year, people can't finish the questions because of lack of time. Therefore, we should coordinate ourselves, which parts must be done carefully and which places can be done faster. In short, it is also very important to allocate time reasonably according to the score distribution and your own situation.

4. About politics. The political exam is the strangest part. People who prepare for two months or even two weeks often exceed those who prepare for half a year. Some people say that luck is very important, but it is not. Politics is actually the most productive. As long as you spend some time and use the right method, 70 points is easy to get. On the political front, since the outline came down in September, preparations have been sufficient. I don't recommend those big handouts. It looks very tiring and wastes time. The most important thing is that most books won't be tested. Buy books from the education department, which is the most authoritative reference book. A thin book can be turned over in a few days. If you have time to recite, you basically don't need other reference books. However, I hate endorsement, so I recommend Wang Suoming's, which is also very thin. This is a clear, thorough and good review. It is enough to lay a good theoretical foundation for these two books. Of course, if you are a science student and feel that you have a poor political foundation and feel insecure about such a thin reference book, I suggest you buy Yue Huating's tutorial, which is the best of all the handouts and has a distinctive style. There are all kinds of cram schools, which, I say responsibly, have little effect except forcing you to make time to study politics. If you have self-control, you don't have to go to those classes to waste time and money. Finally, lectures may be useful, but they are omitted because of insufficient time. At present, the problem group is guessing the problem every year. Except for factual politics, the chances of other parts hitting the original question are very small. Therefore, in the sprint stage, we must not be disturbed by the flood of information. Recite the teacher's last sets of questions today, and follow the top secret trends in the cram school tomorrow. The more sensational the title, the less interesting the result. After the exam every year, you can see all kinds of teachers and netizens in the forum. Actually, so are they. The closer the exam is, the more these messy things will be. What you have to do is to review well according to your own progress. Just look at the top secret simulation questions and guess the questions. Subjective questions mainly depend on how the standard answers are organized and what kind of answering mode is used. There is really no need to recite it. Needless to say, Chen's problem set is the most famous one. Personally, I think this book is comprehensive in knowledge, with explanations for each multiple-choice question, concise and concise, and it is indeed the best of its kind. The fly in the ointment is that too many questions waste energy, Mao and Deng recite too many questions, and the arrangement is outdated. (There are no back questions in Mao this year), Ren Rufen's preface 2 and preface 3 are good, with moderate questions and large fonts, which are comfortable to look at. Regarding the problem set, the key point is to do multiple-choice questions, analyze problems and see whether the questions are correct or not.