Donald Trump
These days, a letter written by Yuan Jinmei, a so-called philosophy professor, to students in China suddenly swept the Internet. However, the content is a strong reader's wind at first glance, which makes me alert. Carefully study this person's background, the source of the letter and the content of the article, and find that this is a letter sent for hype.
Character introduction Yuan Jinmei is a philosophy professor from America. She is now a tenured professor at Crayton University and a member of the Committee of Asian Philosophy and Asian Philosophers of the American Philosophical Association. In recent years, she has published a large number of essays, poems, novels and philosophical papers at home and abroad, and her works have won many awards such as "Newcomer Joint Literature Award".
Let me talk about this so-called Clayton University first. This school is not far from Buffett's hometown of Chicago, Nebraska. How was school? It is said that pre-medical college is good, but others are average, so I won't say much about those who have never been there. But interestingly, the Chinese translation of this school is somewhat similar to Clayton University in the besieged city. He used to be a member of the Committee of Asian Philosophy and Asian Philosophers of the American Philosophical Association, which sounds very famous. In fact, the Department of Philosophy is a mutual aid organization for philosophy researchers. Yuan worked as a committee member for one year in 2007-2008, but people who have spent some time in the United States will understand that the so-called committee is basically a rotten street in the United States, including this so-called committee. Yuan was mainly in charge of the East Division meeting, that is, the East Conference, which was held once, only twice, but she did not attend. This information can be found at/sites/www.apaonline.org/resource/resmgr/Asian _ reports/2008 _ Asians.pdf.
Clayton University recently expelled a graduate student from China, and Professor Yuan Jinmei himself was the tutor of the graduate student. She observed the differences between Chinese and American university education and solemnly wrote a letter to the expelled international students, expressing her views frankly.
This is very problematic. This article first appeared in the seventh issue of Yuhua Magazine on 20 17. Isn't this interesting? He claimed to have written a letter to the students, a personal letter, and the result was published in a magazine. When the magazine editor sent it, he specifically said that in order to protect the privacy of students, the names should be erased. In other words, when Yuan Jinmei contributed, she simply named the students. When it comes to writing an open letter, whoever says who takes advantage first, how things are going, what happened between teachers and students, you poked the open letter to a domestic magazine, and the circle of friends fermented online, but students didn't have a chance to defend themselves, but they occupied public opinion instantly.
"In the United States, or in C University, western culture is everywhere. It is not easy to add a little China cultural research project, which is full of voluntary contributions made by professors. Graduate students are all the works of professors. I use the same standard to ask all graduate students, hoping that every work is excellent. You are disqualified from school and the eleventh job is invalid. It is your failure that you fail to meet the standard. "
Isn't that funny? Are students teachers' works? If you say it yourself, hit yourself in the face? According to your own standards, aren't you fellow travelers looking for truth together?
"In fact, I have never been around the corner with you, nor have I changed my requirements for you. Some of the reasons for your failure are your own responsibility, some are the responsibility of teaching you the educational model and social environment in this way, and some are my responsibility. "
All right, it's time to start spraying China.
"What you want is to visit the United States, have a good relationship with the professor, give some ideas, and let the professor give you some homework according to your design, so you can easily get a degree; With this degree, I will say that I have become a scholar, and then I will find a decent job in China or the United States. You said you wanted to be a university professor in the future. You told me more than once that you must get this degree. I understand the importance of this degree to you. "
What's wrong with this idea?
"In the academic field, you must never lie for any benefit, just tell the truth and be responsible for everything you say; You must be down-to-earth, step by step to find the unknown, there is no shortcut; We must also know our limitations and ignorance, and put our personal perspective and judgment under "justice" so that we can start learning. "
Yuan Jinmei began to pretend to be academic, making it seem that everything except reading and studying is rubbish, and nothing is like the idea of reading high. PhDs and academia are just one of many industries in the world. Which excellent leader in other industries should not be down to earth?
"Talking about your responsibility is actually my final evaluation of you. Or, it is my explanation to you-why you are not suitable for studying. You can be an excellent businessman, company boss or any other professional. Doing academic work is no different from doing business or cleaning, but the professional requirements are obviously different. To learn, you must have personality, and most importantly, you must be a man. The misunderstanding I mentioned earlier is not so much academic as how to be a man. "
Same as above, do business without being a man? Athletes don't want to be human? Newton's personality is average, but few people can match his knowledge. What did you say?/Sorry?
"A scholar should be responsible for every word he says. If you can't or don't want to take this responsibility, don't go this way. I don't train product promoters (no), nor do I train grandstanding network editors (no ability). "
Dude, the problem is that you already sold it online.
"You must take responsibility, including your split personality. It's not entirely your fault. Personality split is the result of abnormal education, which is also the responsibility of your social background that I want to say last. You are the most contradictory student I have ever met. I sympathize with your split personality when I think of your social background. However, I have to point out that this is pathological. You should seek the help of a psychologist as soon as possible to cure this problem. A scholar must be consistent inside and outside, and his words and deeds are consistent. "
Who has a split personality and needs to see a doctor? What do you mean by abnormal education and social background? Are you saying that there is something wrong with the social background of China's abnormal education? Do you think there are no such students in America? Not exactly. I have seen more Americans plagiarize and cheat in the United States for more than ten years. Their psychology is much more fragile than China's. What happened to them? What's the purpose of labeling people as split personality?
Say a little more. The plagiarism mentioned in the original text is really wrong. No matter how clever you are, you can't achieve real success in any field. There is nothing to say.
But mentoring is related to this, and it is said that students are split in personality. Isn't it a problem not to consider your own methods? Before or after C and I, don't consider whether the students later find themselves uninterested in this? Clayton University graduate students are basically full prizes, and it is hard to say who is right or wrong about money.
And this Yuan Jinmei is too pretentious. If you really want to help students, you should send the letter to the media and rely on the media to hide your name. Do you want to deceive people through your right to speak? Public venting means public venting, holding high the banner of helping students know themselves and destroy each other, regardless of subjective factors, which is objectively shameless.
First, use a bluff title, an American professor and an international student, to deceive the trust of the people who eat melons. Then it begins with a title introduction like water, which makes people feel authoritative. The middle emphasizes how to be a man and how to say it is right. Finally, Wan Wen attacked China's educational model and social environment, and the circle of friends incited it to be reproduced and spread on the Internet, which was no different from the previous "river crab" routine articles, and all belonged to attacking others to artificially raise themselves.
Author: Shangshu Youcheng
Link: /question/62925367/ answer/219126010.
Source: Zhihu.
The copyright belongs to the author. Please contact the author for authorization for commercial reprinting, and please indicate the source for non-commercial reprinting.
Bai Xu learned fireball well and became an excellent magician.
People who write such articles are either saints or villains.
If there really is a professor who takes academics as seriously as the letter says, I believe she will be a very noble person. And such a serious person's academic performance will certainly not be too low. So whether this letter is true or not can be judged only by looking at the tutor's character and her academic performance.
Of course, some people will say, you can't waste words because of people. This is a completely wrong idea. In other words, articles promoting morality and morality depend heavily on the words, deeds and experiences of the reasoner. Your practice has proved the rationality and feasibility of your propaganda. If you take it out and ask for blame, everyone will be convinced. Otherwise, it is empty talk and pure blind coercion.
I have seen many heinous crimes, but I have never seen a saint. I am still looking forward to the future development. It is a relief to reveal that the author is a villain, but it is also a good thing to be a saint.
Author: Bai Xu
Link: /question/62925367/ answer/219126010.
Source: Zhihu.
The copyright belongs to the author. Please contact the author for authorization for commercial reprinting, and please indicate the source for non-commercial reprinting.
After reading this letter, I didn't realize the introspection, shame and introspection mentioned in the above answer. Maybe everyone's ideological level is too high for me to reach.
What I see is a man who shows off his values from the commanding heights that the public thinks are just. Her words are full of quiet tone, and she uses this arrogance to package herself as a person without moral defects, but what is the truth?
"I shouldn't have admitted you" seems to be a great injustice. I don't want to talk about the qualities that an educator should have. Just because she can say that students are schizophrenic, this quality is too high for her, which is beyond the reach of a narrow-minded person.
The name professor seems to be a halo, and what anyone says under this halo will be convinced by more people. What's more, what she said was the only fact in the eyes of the audience (let's just say that this person really exists) when the Crusaders had no channels to speak. In fact, however, the professor is just a title, which proves that he has made some achievements in his own professional field. But this does not mean that his personality is nobler and more upright than you and me, and his words are more credible than the average person. What's more, the so-called philosophy professor of such a little-known school.
In my opinion, this is more like a well-planned plan. This open letter has been launched on a large scale by virtue of its own topicality and the intention or not of various media. At the same time, all kinds of one-sided public opinion are even more suspicious. In fact, looking at this letter from another angle, although the letter is in the second person throughout, if you think about it carefully, it really looks like it is addressed to students.
Originally, I had no interest in this topic, which made no sense. I don't hate hype either, but her argument is really annoying. If this thing really exists, I can only say that this behavior of mobilizing public opinion to set fire to a person who has no resistance is despised; If this student didn't exist from the beginning, this letter is the greatest irony to myself.
In fact, the topic has been fermented to this point, and it doesn't matter whether students exist or not.
Author: Wang Xiuming
Link:/question/62925367/answers/created
Source: Zhihu.