I. Interpretation of Access Rules
1. Score takes precedence and follows the principle of voluntariness.
Score first and volunteering means that for the same batch and the same subject as a whole, candidates with high scores have priority to get the opportunity to file (that is, score first), and for individuals, they file in turn according to the order in which candidates fill in their volunteers (that is, volunteering).
"Score priority" means that the provincial admissions office sorts all candidates who meet the admission conditions and apply for the same institution according to their scores first (candidates with the same total score are queued according to the pre-specified single-subject scores, in short, they must be ranked), and then they are enrolled in institutions according to their scores. "That is, high-scoring candidates have priority over low-scoring candidates. Therefore, parallel volunteer is beneficial to candidates with high scores. Under the traditional admission mode of "volunteering first, then scoring", candidates with high scores may not be conducive to volunteering. Because under such rules, college admissions are prone to' big and small years'. If there were many applicants for an institution last year and the admission score was high, candidates would not dare to fill in the institution next year, and the number of applicants would decrease, resulting in a low admission score this year. This phenomenon is called' big and small years'. The phenomenon of "big and small years" is extremely unfavorable for candidates to apply for the exam. Moreover, the traditional sequential volunteer game has a large component, and whether a school accepts the second volunteer candidate depends on the admission result. According to statistics, more than 95% of key universities have completed enrollment in the first choice. This means that as long as the candidate's first choice is not accurate, even if you get an absolute high score, there is a great possibility of falling out of the list. Therefore, it is difficult for traditional sequential volunteering to make the best use of people. The admission principle of "score first" in parallel volunteer can fundamentally solve this problem. Under the admission mode of parallel volunteer, the admission scores of colleges and universities are "flat", which is an intangible protection for candidates with high scores. Therefore, for online high-scoring candidates, we should make full use of their own score advantages, maximize the benefits of college entrance examination volunteers, and avoid high scores as much as possible.
"Volunteer" means that when processing the candidate's volunteer form, the computer will search each batch according to the logical order of parallel volunteer. Once the computer searches that the candidates meet the requirements of an institution, they will file, and then the institution will no longer search for volunteers, and the filing of this batch will end. This tells us that parallel volunteer is not absolutely parallel, and there is an order between the institutions. For example, there are five colleges and universities volunteering in each batch in Yunnan Province, which means that candidates can fill in five colleges and universities in each batch, and these five colleges and universities are in order, and the computer searches in sequence. Therefore, when candidates fill in college volunteers, they should sort them scientifically from the degree of possibility and preference, so as to make their volunteers fill in scientifically, reasonably and hierarchically.
2. The principle of a round of bidding
"One-round filing" is a one-time principle, and the parallel volunteer reported each time is only valid in this round of filing; For candidates, the most important and easily overlooked point is that only the same batch of parallel volunteer in the same round is filled in at a time. As mentioned above, Yunnan Province can fill in five college volunteers in each batch, but under the principle of "one round of filing", candidates can only file in one school, that is, "one filing for four times is invalid". Once the candidate's score reaches the filing line of the first investigated institution, his file will be filed in the institution, and the subsequent voluntary institutions will not be investigated. Even if the candidate's score reaches the filing line of the subsequent voluntary institutions, it will not be filed again. As long as the candidates' files are submitted by the provincial admissions office, other reporting institutions will no longer have the opportunity to file, and this batch of files is over. If the candidate is not accepted after bidding, he will be dismissed and can only wait for the subsequent collection of this batch or participate in the next batch. Because of the confusion of the name parallel volunteer, candidates will think that as long as they meet all the admission conditions of the reporting institution, they will be admitted and will not fail in the exam, so they will be careless and do things hastily. The principle of one-round filing is often ignored by candidates and parents, but this admission principle is of decisive significance to candidates' voluntary reporting. Therefore, candidates must be cautious about this principle when filling in their volunteers, otherwise the consequences are often fatal.
Volunteering for the college entrance examination is a college question. Every year, a large number of candidates fail to get high marks, reminding college entrance examination students and parents to attach great importance to it! If you do well in the college entrance examination, you will volunteer to do well, otherwise everything will be a cloud. If you volunteer well in the college entrance examination, add 50 points. To fill in the college entrance examination volunteers, you need to be familiar with high-tech policies, effectively avoid the risk of entering the exam, and avoid capsizing in the gutter, causing lifelong regret!
3. The principle of validity
Validity refers to that colleges and universities file under the control of ethnic and single-subject conditions, and those who do not meet the conditions do not participate in the file. Candidates must meet the admission conditions and requirements of their institutions in order to make their institutions volunteer effectively. Therefore, candidates should not be careless in the process of selecting newspapers in colleges and universities, pay attention to details and avoid mistakes in volunteering. For example, in the enrollment plan of 20 15 in Yunnan, Sichuan University requires that the college entrance examination English should reach 75% in principle. If the candidate's English score does not reach 75%, but only fills in the financial major of Sichuan University, even if the candidate's score reaches the filing line of Sichuan University, it will not be filed, and the candidate's volunteer in this institution will be invalid and the opportunity to file in this institution will be lost. In view of the validity principle of the college entrance examination, candidates should pay attention to the application details and recognize whether they meet the admission requirements of colleges and universities, otherwise, they should not fill in the form easily, so as not to waste the opportunity to fill in the form.
4. The principle of care in the province.
Care in the province refers to the candidates who enjoy the extra care of the college entrance examination in the province. If the score (including bonus points) reaches the minimum filing line of the reporting institution, it is not limited by the proportion of filing, and can directly file with the institution. The above is one of the principles of filing in parallel volunteer, Yunnan Province. Other provinces may have other regulations and there are differences. This admission rule is undoubtedly good news for candidates who enjoy extra points in Yunnan Province to apply for colleges and universities in the province. Such candidates can make full use of this preferential policy to win better opportunities and possibilities for themselves.
Second, coping strategies.
Even under the background of implementing the admission rules of parallel volunteer, students fail in the college entrance examination every year. Take Yunnan Province as an example. In 20 15, the first batch of control lines for undergraduate science and engineering in Yunnan province was 500 points, and the second batch of control lines for undergraduate science and engineering was 425 points. However, there were still 547 and 525 "high-scoring candidates" among the students who participated in the second batch of science and engineering volunteers in Yunnan Province on July 3 1 day. Such students are typical candidates who fail to apply for the exam. Such failure cases are common every year, which tells us that there are great risks in volunteering for the college entrance examination. Candidates must establish a sense of risk, especially those with high scores, and try to avoid the tragedy of failing the list. Only by establishing the risk awareness of college entrance examination, actively responding and making overall plans can candidates minimize the risk of college entrance examination and improve the effectiveness of voluntary reporting.
(1) The risk of gear withdrawal exists objectively.
Under the current admission system, the policy stipulates that the number of colleges and universities is slightly larger than the number of college enrollment plans. "According to the batch of parallel volunteer, the proportion of filing is controlled within 105% in principle." Such rules can be used for colleges and universities to choose the best candidates, so candidates with low scores will face the risk of quitting their files. According to the principle of "one-round filing", once a candidate's file is voluntarily withdrawn by an institution, it will no longer be filed by subsequent institutions, and this round of filing is over. Therefore, candidates must keep in mind the golden rule that "investment is not equal to admission". Filing is the application of provincial recruitment office to colleges and universities, and admission is the professional admission of colleges and universities. Filing and admission are two links, operating separately. Even if the candidates' files are submitted to a university by the Provincial Admissions Office, if the candidates' scores are not dominant, they will still be rejected, because the proportion of files submitted is 105%, and the redundant candidates' files will naturally be rejected. In view of this, candidates should fully weigh their scores and rankings when choosing institutions, and try to match their scores with the institutions they apply for. Don't take chances that they will get lower scores and higher grades.
(2) Reasonable positioning is the most important.
In order to minimize the risk of college entrance examination, the fundamental solution is accurate positioning, that is, to make your college entrance examination score and the admission score of your institution reach the most matching state. To achieve this ideal state, candidates need to invest a lot of time and energy to study the admission scores and trends of colleges and universities in recent years, so as to ensure the accuracy of volunteering. However, due to various uncertainties, it is not easy to achieve a high degree of matching. Even if you think your volunteering is reasonable, you should take certain preventive measures and strategies.
(3) Be cautious about whether to obey professional adjustment.
As mentioned above, filing and admission are two different links, "filing is not equal to admission", and it is common to be dismissed after filing. There are two main reasons for being rejected after filing. One is that under the current policy of 105% filing ratio, the existence of filing risk becomes inevitable; The second is that candidates are dismissed for not obeying professional adjustment. The professional strength of each school is very different, and the social cognition of popular unpopular majors caused by various factors leads to a big gap in the professional admission scores of each school. For example, the architecture with the highest average admission score of Beijing Northeastern University is 6 14, the computer science and technology with the lowest average admission score is 548, and the difference between the highest and lowest admission scores is as high as 66 points. Therefore, we should fully consider which university and major to fill in. Under the premise of clearly understanding your hobbies, personality characteristics and career planning, you should also make your college entrance examination scores reach the professional admission scores of the colleges you apply for. If your score is not dominant, you can consider filling in the column of professional adjustment to reduce the risk of falling out of the list. Based on this understanding, you should volunteer to fill in expert advice, and candidates choose to obey professional adjustment when applying for schools.
(4) Set a reasonable slope
Under the parallel volunteer model, usually about 5 colleges and universities can be enrolled in each batch. So, how to choose the same batch of institutions? How to sort between colleges and universities in the same batch? These are all questions that candidates should seriously consider when filling in their volunteers. If candidates put low-scoring schools in the front and high-scoring schools in the back, once the low scores are accepted, they will lose the opportunity to file with high-scoring schools. Obviously, such a reporting strategy is unreasonable, so how can we sort it scientifically?
Generally speaking, the basic principle of parallel volunteer's ranking is "one rush, one stability and one guarantee". Specifically, candidates should fill in their volunteers in the order of high scores to low scores at the school level, forming a reasonable gradient between institutions. "Chong, Chong" means that candidates can put their favorite institutions with high admission scores in the first place as sprint institutions. On the premise of analyzing the admission scores in recent 3-5 years, candidates can fill in an institution with an average admission score about 20 points higher than their college entrance examination score. In the reality of "blind newspaper" in college entrance examination, there is also the possibility of making mistakes. "Slow and steady" means to ensure that your college entrance examination scores are equivalent to the average scores of colleges and universities, and try to match the scores of colleges and universities. Such institutions should be their ideal and most likely to be admitted. Therefore, when choosing such institutions, candidates should think carefully and weigh comprehensively to ensure the scientific choice of intermediate institutions and the maximization of application benefits. "One guarantee" is to prevent candidates from falling out of the list. Candidates should choose at least one institution with high possibility of admission as the most secure institution, and consider reporting the institutions whose average admission score is lower than their college entrance examination score 15. The advantage of choosing such institutions is that they can be admitted in this batch, and they will not participate in collecting volunteers or fall into the next batch of applications, thus losing the initiative to choose. The above strategies can ensure the initiative of candidates to a great extent, as long as they are fully prepared, scientifically matched and reasonably estimated, I believe such strategies can bring ideal results to candidates.