"People should pursue perfection" 1. "People", don't think there is anything to say about this, that's my problem-there is a difference between this "person" and "person": now I think "individual" should not pursue perfection, because everyone's time and energy are limited, so they can only have their own strengths (. And "people" must pursue perfection in order to develop continuously. So as a positive side, remember to define this "person" well. 2. What are the key points of "pursuing" and "pursuing" (focusing on the process) or "seeking" (caring about the result)? Perfection can be defined as unattainable. Then, forcibly reaching an unattainable goal has advantages and disadvantages, which is also a weapon that the other party may use to attack. The definition of "perfection" and "perfection" is the biggest difference in this debate. Not only do different dictionaries have different explanations, but also a dictionary gives a variety of explanations-some can be realized, some can't. There are "already the best", "now the best (not necessarily the best in the future)" and so on. It's up to the debaters to decide which one to choose = = = = = = = = = = = = Recently, I'm glad to see that the posts about the debate on Baidu forum are getting more and more exciting! Everyone's wonderful exposition of different views (arguments), even attacks and arguments, is emitting more and more wisdom. Pvdwvj- The junior manager's answer is really great. Although he is modest, he is "not carefully organized", but his logic and level are already superb. (Although I said to "I don't agree with upstairs, ... is the work of primary school students" in my answer, I still used what I said in my last answer. If the other party puts forward that "no one is perfect", I believe we can't directly condemn him as a "pupil"-although "person" in "No One is Perfect" obviously refers to "individual", we can't stop the other party from arguing and defining "person" as "individual" (although we can seize this point to attack, we can't stop it), let alone confide in front of the judges and the audience. This is a perspective that we didn't have when we participated in the debate many years ago (when the "harmony theory" was not put forward). I said that I was "moved by the opposition materials I prepared". In fact, I also support the view that was opposed at that time, as pvdwvj wrote: "This goal is perfection. Regardless of his differences in everyone's mind, I also thought that everyone had their own goals and pursued their own "perfection". However, should we pursue Hitler's "perfection" If you should say it, your life will be ruined. If not, how can I answer myself (the argument assigned to me at that time was positive), "Everyone should pursue the perfection in his own mind" and "regardless of his differences in everyone's mind"? So I believe that "people should pursue harmony rather than perfection" is indeed a good argument (but I am afraid that the landlord will have a slight headache. Can you change your mind a little and rely on harmony when defining your own perfection? = = = = = = = The landlord added, "I hope everyone will also focus on' psychological debate' and have some opinions.

Please accept it, thank you!