I think in some activities or competitions of university newspaper, voting accounts for a large proportion in the final score evaluation. I think this is an insult to the players who really have the ability not to canvass, and completely loses the meaning of this competition. Not by the level of the players, but by how many people voted. Just like some competitions held by the official WeChat account of Yiban or various schools' associations and student unions, you need to vote. Our university should not just "please reply when you receive it" and "help to vote", so that the four-year university life becomes very boring.

First of all, we must face up to one point, that is, these official WeChat accounts or new media that initiated voting need someone's attention. Your college classmates throw you a link, so you must open it with WeChat and follow the official account of WeChat before you can vote for the person you want to vote for. In this process, more people will pay attention to these official WeChat accounts. In fact, I think whether to pay attention to an official WeChat account depends on whether the articles it pushes are in line with and beneficial to college students. If the same news event is presented on all the official WeChat accounts concerned, it will make me feel very cumbersome, overlapping information and wasting time. Although we may look at the problem from different angles, I don't easily believe that a few college students' new media writers can match the experienced core writers of the official mainstream media.

Every time I don't want to participate in the kind of competition that requires WeChat voting to evaluate winning or losing or ranking. Although the referendum era is approaching, many people will forward voting links in my parents' WeChat circle of friends. In these polls, many of them are the cutest babies, who like to take free art photos and are the most satisfied units in a certain area. Actually, I want to say that it's okay to vote for you, but you need to know if your baby is cute. Is it really free to take free art photos? You have advertised for free. Is it appropriate to mobilize friends around us to vote for their own units instead of serving the people wholeheartedly? This will cause you to do nothing, and as a result, you will cast a conclusion that the masses in your unit are highly satisfied. In fact, there is a big problem in logic.

In universities, learning should be the main task, and excellent professional knowledge is needed to stand out from the competition. Otherwise, the whole country will vote for academicians, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences may not accommodate so many people. The sports meeting is not about the results of the competition, but about the comments and forwarding of Weibo Class 1 on WeChat in which college. The selection of the spiritual civilization award is also by voting. In this way, the sports meeting has completely lost its meaning, and it is no longer to show the spirit of athletes' hard work and publicize the concept of loving sports and keeping fit. Whether or not to win the prize depends not on the athletes, but on the number of votes of each college.

I saw an interesting news, which can only be described as interesting. Pupils played football, and their parents helped them win the championship. Then if each of us votes for the national football team, the World Cup champion really has nothing to do with other countries.