In the past two weeks, I have been fascinated by the courses of Chaos University, especially the first principles of Shan Li which I just finished reading yesterday. My brain is wide open. For example, I have read a lot of works in the last two years, and then I have 10 years of experience in stock trading, learning to drive at the beginning of the year and so on. I have some vague ideas that learning should have the simplest mode, everything is, but I didn't expect to be inspired by teaching-mode, yes. Learning any skills quickly can fall into this category, but there are still some shortcomings. Deliberate practice gives a model, but it also gives a range: in those fields that have reached a high level, because there can be the best tutors. Here comes a new problem: even the best tutor, it is impossible for everyone to learn from others, and the cost is there, otherwise there will be countless masters in the world. Hehe, it's a little beside the point. I want to think about this before starting another article.

After watching the professor's class, I searched the internet for the contents of his class and some information about himself-such is human nature. Eating eggs tastes good, just like going to see which chicken laid the eggs. I found many articles criticizing him and Wang Dongyue on the Internet, especially in Zhihu, and many articles criticizing Chaos University. Hehe, actually, what I want to say is that different people have different opinions. At worst, you can learn some cognitive knowledge! Such as Jobs and Darwin. That is to say, the knowledge of drivers mentioned by the professor is really a lot. As Zhao Zhou said, even if one hour of a year's course is useful to you, it is enough to make up for your meager tuition. There is no need to say those words there. Finally, if you are awesome, you can overthrow him and build your own system!

The good things of Chaos University, including getting, are all good things, and the concept is correct. Today's society surpasses any society in history, because there have never been so many literate people in a society, and the level of this culture is still rising. It can be predicted that books will increase geometrically in the future. The so-called knowledge explosion in the past is nothing compared with the knowledge explosion in the future. So, I really like it after reading the first principle. If I do division, I will do division in the future. I have too much knowledge!

And Lao Wang's point of view. Nowadays, there is a lack of such people in society, and philosophy and the like are all useless. Shouldn't there be a lot of philosophers in today's society? Only a hundred schools of thought contend can we create something more progressive. Such a person is hard to produce, and you criticized him with the theory of a hundred years ago. If you have the energy, you can also come up with a system to refute him, refute him!