Opening statement: Thank you, Chairman, judges, guests and another debater. Now let me express our view that discipline promotes the development of personality. Discipline can create a good social environment, thus promoting the development of personality. In Marx's materialist dialectics, there is a discussion about freedom and regulation, which says that the purpose of making regulations is to make everyone independent and free. From this perspective, the law does not limit the existence of personality development. Discipline can promote the healthy growth of personality to some extent. Organizational discipline and personality development complement each other. College students need to cultivate their own physical quality, psychological quality, ideological and moral quality and intelligent quality. All these aspects need a certain degree of organizational discipline to guide people's behavior. Only in a stable and orderly environment can people practice their own personality. Organizational discipline is the premise of personality development. As the saying goes, "Fiona Fang can't be made without rules". Organizational rules are rules, norms and constraints, which are used to constrain certain behaviors of individuals. Looking around, whether macro or micro, there is discipline everywhere. The existence and development of individuals are carried out within the rules of this "Fiona Fang". Without this "Fiona Fang", I don't think this world would be a world. In our society composed of individuals, we also need various disciplines to develop and progress. Therefore, organizational discipline and personality development do not conflict in essence. With good organizational discipline, we can have a better space to play our individuality. Finally, we emphasize once again that discipline can promote personality development! Thank you. Counterargument: through the debate between the two sides, we still insist that "discipline inhibits personality development" We don't deny that discipline that meets the requirements can promote personality development. Other debaters put too much emphasis on discipline to promote personality development, which is extreme. From the other side's point of view, discipline is used to promote our personality development. The essence of discipline is to demand unity. Taking discipline as a model of personal growth is enough to imagine that future mission bearers are likely to become guardians of discipline and a model of conservatism. The so-called personality development, for college students, is to carry forward the consciousness, enthusiasm and initiative of learning, and make scientific judgments and accurate choices on learning content and methods according to the needs of market economy and social development. Cultivate your ability of independent thinking, hands-on and innovation, and find the path of follow-up learning as soon as possible. And can apply what they have learned, make discoveries and make inventions. The purpose of teaching reform is to give college students more free space and a more relaxed educational environment, but they all study freely and independently, from which they can discover and cultivate their own specialties and become people interested in learning. In this way, college students actually need to work harder, while learning and thinking about using it. Stay in school, always pay attention to the society and market, learn to obtain information through various channels, understand the trend of social demand, and adjust the learning content and methods. If discipline is to promote personality development, how can we talk about "education reform" when China's education system promotes personality development so strongly? I'm done summing up.

Most subjects in the school do not restrict the development of personality, but draw a road for the development of personality, and we can go along this road all the time. The other party said: "Only by reforming the current bad education management mechanism and abolishing the disciplines that will restrict personality can students' personality be fully developed. "That is to say, the other party agrees that perfect discipline can promote the development of personality.

Individual bad discipline may cause some restrictions on students, but the possibility of inferiority can't hide the inevitability of superiority. For example, someone was killed by driving, but you can't say that driving is a bad thing. So in general, discipline promotes the development of personality.

I don't know where the other party's definition of discipline comes from. Let me tell you, according to the Modern Chinese Dictionary, discipline: rules and regulations formulated by political parties, organs, armed forces, organizations and enterprises to safeguard collective interests and ensure the normal work, which each member is required to abide by. It does not only represent the interests of some people.

Another debater thinks that discipline restricts the development of personality, so should discipline be abolished?

Another debater, you should know that every city wall has a gate!

The state has laws, society has social ethics, political parties have their own organizational discipline, and schools also have their own rules and regulations. It's not like primitive society, which does things at will and by instinct. Personality development needs complete and standardized discipline to improve.

Discipline is like a person's left hand, and personality is like a person's right hand. Some people think that using the left hand is more useful than using the right hand, while others think that the right hand is more useful than the left hand. Which should we use first? Of course, none. It is necessary for the left and right sides to cooperate with each other and coordinate their use in order to play to the extreme. Therefore, discipline promotes personality development. Then please give examples to prove each other's point of view!

The other debater thinks that discipline will inhibit the development of personality, so why do you go to school and openly stand on the debate platform to develop your personality? Why don't you pack up and go home to develop your so-called personality?

Positive conclusion: Chairman, judges, debaters, students! Good afternoon everyone! Our view is that discipline promotes personality development. The other debater repeatedly stressed that discipline restricts personality development. Obviously ignoring the importance of the existence of organizational discipline and overemphasizing the development of personality, then I want to ask: if personality is placed above organizational discipline, what will be the ultimate consequence? You can only hit a wall everywhere!

What we emphasize is: first, organizational discipline is the premise of personality development. As the saying goes, "No rules, no Fiona Fang". A country has laws, a society has social morality, a political party has its own organizational discipline, a school has its own rules and regulations, and individuals act within the "Fiona Fang" rules. Secondly, organizational discipline and personality development are consistent. There is no absolute freedom in this world. Freedom is relative to freedom under the law. Only in a good environment can I study and live with peace of mind and express my personality. The two do not conflict in essence. Finally, I hope everyone can promote the cohesion of the team in terms of team discipline and the rules of this debate.

Let's sing loudly: there are differences in personality, competition in difference, progress in competition and development in progress. Let each of us spread our wings to welcome the beautiful sunny day. My concluding remarks are over. Thank you, Chairman, thank you, thank you, and thank you, the jury.