1. Whoever starts first will make a mistake.
The old man said in an interview that he had an argument with the noodle shop owner because the noodle shop owner took the lead in coming to his booth and pushed all his pancakes and sweet potatoes into the oven. The stall owner of fried noodles didn't want the old man to put the stall behind her, so he began to vent his dissatisfaction, and then the old man began to fight back.
If what the old man said is true, then it is wrong who started this matter. The booth is not fixed, and there is no special person to divide the corresponding booth. In this case, who should occupy which position is entirely arranged by these stall owners themselves. In the end, everyone must have a booth.
It is very wrong to drive others away at will because of competition and destroy all the fruits of others' labor for no reason.
Afterwards, the stall owner of fried noodles also responded to this. She said that she kicked the old man's car because he pushed her child.
There is nothing wrong with the urgency of protecting children, but the owner of the fried noodle stall has never responded to the focus of the matter. Who started it? For what reason? Only by paying attention to these problems can we find the source of contradictions.
2. If there are contradictions, we should discuss and communicate more.
As stall owners, they all come out to make a living and should take care of each other. If there is any contradiction between them, they should also solve it by communication instead of hitting people.
Once anyone moves his hand for no reason, he becomes the initiator of the incident, and there is no need to blame public opinion for favoring each other.