When I was in high school, my teacher often told us that if you work harder now, it will be easier when you go to college, so we worked so hard in senior three to get into a good university.

However, after entering the university, the whole person will become loose, like a bird escaping from a cage. As long as he doesn't fail, he can graduate with all credits, which seems to be his whole pursuit.

In view of this problem, briefly talk about my point of view.

First of all, some colleges and universities are really pushing forward the reform of strict entry and strict exit recently. Including relevant policies, enrollment standards and graduation standards, have been reformed accordingly. This is a good thing, which is conducive to improving students' academic level and talent quality, promoting social values of fairness and justice, avoiding shoddy "talents" and providing more positive energy and contributions to society. Only those who really work hard and have academic and professional level can gain greater recognition, thus creating a good atmosphere for good money to drive out bad money in the whole society, which will certainly promote the country's talent training and export to a higher level.

Secondly, why should we carry out strict reforms? I think the most fundamental thing is to meet the needs of historical development trends. There are indeed many problems in the wide entrance and exit of universities. From time to time, I can hear that a star can easily get a graduate student or even a doctorate from a famous university, but his words and deeds are surprising, such as the endless stream of paper fraud ... These problems are all concentrated withdrawals from the university's leniency. The essence of education is to cultivate high-quality talents with all-round development in morality, intelligence, physique, beauty and labor. University education is directly responsible for exporting valuable talents for the development of the country and society. If we blindly lower the threshold, educate for "expanding scale" and run schools for "economic benefits" and fail to cultivate "truly qualified" talents that meet the needs, it will seriously deviate from the purpose of university education and lead to bad social consequences.

Therefore, it is a good thing that some colleges and even vocational schools strongly advocate strict admission and withdrawal! Benefit the country, benefit the people and benefit education!

This general trend is like this. After all, there are many parallel college students who have expanded their enrollment for so many years. Note that the more famous universities are, the stricter the requirements for graduates are.

I think it should be tempering justice with mercy.

I think so, but not 30 years ago.

Twenty-five years ago, I was studying in a university in Nanjing, and the Tibetan students in my department only got 190 in the college entrance examination-I couldn't keep up with anything, but I graduated smoothly and became an official in Tibet.

Now my son is studying in Harbin, because the online class is as tired as a dog-it's not good to graduate!