From the teacher's point of view, it is not a problem that teachers can solve by themselves. Influenced by many factors, this paper simply analyzes from the students themselves and teachers themselves what conditions a student should meet in order to be admitted to a key university.

First of all, the student may not study very well, even to the extent of scum, but he must have some qualities, such as being firm and persistent in his goals, being able to endure hardships and not giving up, being very sensitive in thinking, or simply speaking, his IQ is very high, otherwise it is almost impossible for you to counterattack in a short time. Because the world is fair, others have studied for so many years before they are admitted to key universities. If you don't have particularly good innate conditions, why can you be admitted in such a short time?

Secondly, the teacher himself. I hope you can spare enough time to teach him. It must be the kind of teacher who is particularly serious and responsible, because for a student, a lot of basic knowledge is unknown. Teachers have to spend a lot of time and energy to make him sensible. In this respect, what seems simple to many other students is very difficult for him. If the teacher doesn't have a good attitude and enough time, it is impossible to provide enough guidance to this student, teacher.

Finally, the problem of communication between teachers and students. Teachers have this heart, and students have this heart. They want to establish contact, and finally reach a result, that is, the student is willing to work hard and the teacher is willing to help the student, so that he can counterattack. It is only possible, because others have studied hard for more than ten years before being admitted to a key university, and you have studied hard for three and a half months before being admitted. This is obviously unfair, unless your IQ is against the sky.