At present, the system is mainly in two aspects:
One is to leave the original job, that is, transfer, wait for a job, leave and retire. This kind of "leaving" refers to those teachers who can't stay in their original jobs because of subjective and objective factors. For example, transfer those teachers who are old and lack of energy to other posts; Teachers with incorrect working attitude and poor teaching ability should go through on-the-job training, pass the examination and re-take up their posts; For old teachers who need to rest because of serious illness, measures such as "leaving their posts" and "retiring" are implemented.
The second is to leave the faculty, that is, to be fired. This kind of dismissal, which belongs to a more serious category, is to remove those incompetent teachers from the teaching staff and then dismiss them. For example, teachers who seriously violate professional ethics may be dismissed, teachers who "eat empty salaries" or teachers who "recruit privately and hire indiscriminately". .
The purpose of implementing the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" is to ensure that primary and secondary school students receive high-quality basic education and promote their all-round development.
As soon as this proposal came out, it caused a hot discussion on the internet and also caused panic among teachers.
Although many people complain about this, many universities, especially some first-class universities, have done so, which has greatly promoted the research of young teachers and indeed many young scholars have emerged under this pressure. Some colleges and universities will also carry out further reforms to encourage in-service teachers by means of "separation of professional title evaluation" and reverse the situation of some teachers lying flat.
Supernumerary posts are no longer iron rice bowls, and those who pass supernumerary exams may not be comfortable. You know, there is no stable job in this world, and everything depends on your own strength. It is full of many incomprehensible contradictions. For example, in the current field of education, it is necessary to implement "delayed retirement" for front-line teachers, and in some areas, a "teacher withdrawal mechanism" must be formulated ..... There are not enough teachers, so "delayed retirement" is naturally understandable; If there are too many teachers, it is not necessary to engage in a "teacher withdrawal mechanism", but what about front-line teachers?
The reason why educators "delay retirement" should be because the current aging of teachers is serious and the number of teachers will be short. Older teachers will delay their retirement by three to five years. Using these three to five years to train young and outstanding teachers can temporarily play a buffering role.
draw
However, there are still some defects in teachers' delayed retirement. For example, teachers are a "youth meal" industry. Front-line teachers, especially primary and secondary school teachers, have great problems with their eyesight, hearing, energy and memory after they reach the age of 60. If you are not a particularly tough old teacher, it is not necessarily a good thing for teachers or students to continue teaching.
After another wave of unrest, the wave of "delayed retirement" has not subsided, and the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" has begun to join in the fun again. Why do you want to engage in a "teacher withdrawal mechanism"? Some people say that it may be because there are fewer and fewer people born now, and the number of students will decrease in a few years, so the demand for teachers will not be so much, so the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" came into being.
draw
Too many teachers? Don't stop recruiting for ten years or three to five years and everything will be solved? If the new teacher can't get in, the old teacher will gradually retire on a large scale. Nine times out of ten, the decrease in the number of teachers and the sharp drop in the number of students will "vibrate at the same frequency." Isn't the so-called surplus of teachers solved? Why "massive" retirement? At present, the age structure of teachers in many schools tends to be aging, and it is not uncommon for schools where the average age of in-service teachers is over 50.
And using the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" to make front-line teachers feel a sense of crisis will make those teachers who are rich in "personal resources" but don't go to school often lose their jobs? Will those teachers who are like hob meat quit the three-foot platform? Today, the headmaster ruined his job with the hob meat, and tomorrow they may go to the headmaster's house for dinner with pots and pans. What did you make the front-line principal feel sorry for?
draw
For honest and hard-working teachers, they may feel that they will not be swept out of the house if they are hard-working and hard-working, but you must be clear that soft persimmons will only be pinched by meat eaters first, and even if their ability is poor, hard slag may remain and become the "backbone" of a school. Accompanied by it, there are naturally flattering and delicate "high emotional intelligence" teachers, and there are also "nepotism teachers" with good "personal resources".
When I was doing a math problem when I was a child, I saw that "there are two water pipes in the pool, a water inlet pipe and a water outlet pipe, and the two water pipes are open at the same time ..." The problem of "water in" and "water out" at the same time every day. I feel water in my head when I do the problem-is this going in or out? And the current "delayed retirement" and "teacher withdrawal mechanism" are very similar to the two "water pipes" of that year?