Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - The second trial of Nanjing female college students' murder case pronounced the woman's boyfriend "culpable of punishment"?
The second trial of Nanjing female college students' murder case pronounced the woman's boyfriend "culpable of punishment"?
This man certainly deserves it. His crime was premeditated, cruel and outrageous, which brought extremely bad influence to the whole society. Because of the bad nature of the case, the victim has won the sympathy of the public, and the reasonable demands of his family members have also been understood and supported by the public, and the public has maintained concern about the case. Therefore, the case can be said to be heard in public, and the final result is that the original judgment is upheld in the second instance. As long as we wait for the review results of the High Court, the case has even been closed.

Accepting legal sanctions In addition to the leader of the principal offender in this case, several other principal offenders were also sentenced to death with a suspended execution. It can be seen that these perpetrators will eventually be brought to justice, and their actions determine that they deserve it. Because they cruelly deprived others of their lives and caused bad social influence, they can no longer stand the condemnation of the public, and will be judged by law and will bear the consequences for their actions.

Since ancient times? Killing for life? This is not only the law, but also the bottom line of the whole social morality. Both rural villagers and people in high positions know this iron law, and anyone who challenges this legal provision can't escape legal sanctions.

Although the law is long, it does not leak. Qiao Hong, the woman's boyfriend, lured her to a strange place and killed her cruelly with others. In the whole case, his criminal motive is very clear. He is the initiator, planner and commander of the whole case, and the leader of the principal offender, so he deserves the heaviest punishment.

The result of upholding the original judgment in the second instance was generally expected, and the man deserved it, which made the public applaud and comforted the families of the victims.