Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - Is Wu Shulian's ranking meaningful?
Is Wu Shulian's ranking meaningful?
Wu Shulian's ranking is significant.

Wu Shulian is a person's name and graduated from Zhejiang University. The ranking of Wu Shulian University has great influence, but the recognition seems to be not very high. Wu Shulian ranking is the ranking of Chinese mainland University edited by Wu Shulian. Wu Shulian's ranking has the most influential university evaluation in China.

Wu Shulian's ranking covers the overall strength and performance, professional strength, average academic level of teachers, teachers' performance, quality of undergraduate graduates, quality of freshmen and other sub-rankings. The overall strength and performance ranking reflect the comprehensive strength of the school in all aspects, the professional ranking reflects the discipline strength, and the academic level and performance ranking of teachers reflect the real level of teachers.

From the comparison between the quality ranking of freshmen and the quality ranking of undergraduate graduates, we can also see the efficiency of the transformation of university talent training resources. Wu Shulian's "China University Rankings Fill in Volunteer Extraordinary Edition" takes into account the above indicators and should be the key reference when applying for the exam.

The person in charge of this university ranking project is Wu Shulian, who claims to be from Guangdong Branch of China Academy of Management Sciences, but this has never been confirmed by China Academy of Management Sciences. The Chinese Academy of Management Sciences also distanced itself from the relationship, clarifying that there are no research institutes in its subordinate units, and the ranking is only a commercial product.

University ranking can only be used as a reference standard and should not be over-praised;

1, university ranking may kidnap universities. If all colleges and universities take the promotion of ranking as the school-running criterion and only do the work that is conducive to ranking, it will cause colleges and universities to violate the school-running laws. What's more, because the ranking is unified and standardized, excessive reference will make the development of colleges and universities lose its characteristics.

2. Universities rely too much on data, which leads some universities to produce data in pursuit of ranking. What's more, they force teachers to falsify data, which is a serious violation of school-running norms and academic ethics.

3. Widened the gap between universities. The higher the ranking, the easier it is for colleges and universities to obtain social resources, which is the main motive force for colleges and universities to praise ranking, and also causes the Matthew effect among colleges and universities, making it difficult for people to obtain higher education resources in relatively equal.