First of all, it is an indisputable fact that it is difficult for rural children to stay in high flyers. This is not only the result of the development of the times, but also the reason for the unreasonable distribution of educational resources. Children in many big cities occupy a unique advantage from the beginning, and the difficulty and score of the college entrance examination are relatively low. They also have rich educational resources, excellent educational environment, excellent teachers, various extracurricular remedial classes and training courses, so that all the children trained are the lucky ones. On the other hand, rural children, although the country has been constantly strengthening the construction of rural education in recent years, are not involved in many areas, and there are few rural areas, schools and teachers. In such a learning environment, no matter how low your head is, I'm afraid it's not as good as one-tenth of the children in the city. Therefore, there are fewer and fewer rural children in famous universities.
In addition, many rural parents generally believe that since they can't get into a famous university, there is no need to continue their studies, because in their minds, if their children go to a bad university, it is equivalent to wasting time and money. It is better to go out to work to solve the current economic situation and reduce the family burden. Therefore, many rural children drop out of school, and the number of students admitted to universities is naturally decreasing year by year.
Rural areas pay far less attention to education than friends in cities. Because their education level is not very high, they are unable to tutor their children, and the village does not have enough conditions to tutor their children. Long-term neglect will make them more relaxed and pay less attention to their studies. I'm sure I won't get into a good university in the end. Relatively poor universities, from the perspective of parents, it makes no difference whether they go to college or not.
Generally speaking, because the educational resources are more and more concentrated, it is dominant for children in cities, and they have the opportunity to enter key universities, have access to higher-level educational environment, and have the opportunity to enter a higher-level social class in the future. I hope that friends in rural areas can pay more attention to children's education in the future, and it is reasonable for knowledge to change fate.