Xiong Hao's eloquence and literary talent are impressive, and he is worthy of being a young professor at Fudan University. Every time he speaks, he is always moved by his deep affection and erudition. The theme of this debate is whether we should try our best to catch up with our peers. Xiong Hao is the opponent of Sanbian, while the mentors Liu Qing, Xue Zhaofeng and Xu all chose their opponents. Teacher Cai Kangyong just stood in a positive position under everyone's "coercion". It can be seen that from the general trend, the opponent's chances of winning are much greater, but in the end, the opponent won and Xiong Hao failed to advance. Let's review the contents of the debate in Xiong Hao. Seriously, personally, I think his argument should be highly diversified, meaningful and poetic, and both the text and the content are impeccable. But in the end, I lost. I think what he lost was not the talent for debate, nor the profound thoughts, but the cruel reality of China.

"We won't see other people's backs on a one-way street. Why should we live the power of youth in youth? Life is an endless river and life is an infinite game. Your life is not to see a cherry blossom in full bloom, but to keep growing. Every time is full of brilliance. You can't see all the flowers in Chang 'an. I care about the beautiful scenery outside the window! "

Every sentence has a deep feeling and philosophy in it, but perhaps it is because of the cruelty of reality that Xiong Hao's views are precious and make me yearn for them. But in reality, few people have the courage to pursue their inner life. I can only say that most of such a beautiful and philosophical life only lives in people's hearts, and it is precisely because of its beauty that everyone yearns for it. But the distance between ideal and reality is not only an insurmountable gap, but also the real courage that ordinary people lack. However, no matter who has real courage, they really live what Xiong Hao said. It is only rare in contemporary times.

Our generation has just caught up with the era of rapid development of science and technology, and its by-products are impetuousness and desperate money. In the past, the eight-hour working day won by the working people through bloody struggle was gradually replaced by the current 996 and white plus black. Especially this year, as soon as the epidemic affected, some people even twisted their jobs into "I wish I had a job now!" The irrationality in this job and the complaints that the boss can't see are automatically drowned out. And this is exactly what Qiu Yang said. The so-called love is just the love of genius. What are we ordinary people pursuing? Most of us are pursuing a life of adequate food and clothing. In recent years, the changes in my hometown have advanced by leaps and bounds, and the lives of ordinary people are getting better and better, which makes me feel that people all over the country live like this. Later, I was shocked to find that there were such poor people in some mountainous areas. I am ashamed of my ignorance. It turns out that not everyone runs towards a well-off society together. In The Essence of Poverty, the author points out that there are more than 800 million poor people in China, and for these people, they can only live a good life. So when Qiuyang talked about the argument of why to pursue, I, a woman who has been out of poverty, was deeply moved.

Qiu Yang said: Don't be afraid of pain. Nothing hurts more than life itself. As long as you pursue your life, you will be full of pride and self-confidence, and you will not say that the world is not worth it. If one day you stop trying, what you lose is not the result, but the right to imagine. What do we ordinary people do for? The so-called love is a topic of genius, so what do we ordinary people pursue? You go to the street and ask, what ordinary people are most upset about is not even that I can't do what I love, but that I'm not sure if I have a destiny takes a hand's mission. Therefore, what we are pursuing and creating is not a great feat, but an ordinary life. So I hate those marketing numbers that don't give chicken soup spoons. It tells you that just because you don't have a career you love enough, and just because you don't work hard for your dreams every day, your life is worthless. It is taking away the value and significance of every ordinary person's efforts. It tells me that it is meaningless and meaningful to swim from one pool to another in the crowded subway every day. I don't believe it. So why chase it with your life? We didn't get too good things, but we got ourselves. I don't need to save the world. I tried to catch up. I saved my life. This is the heroism of an ordinary person.

In fact, personally, I am definitely the unsociable person, and I deeply realize that I am the uncompromising person. Between Qiuyang and Xiong Hao, Xiong Hao is definitely more to my taste, and our temperament is more similar, but in the face of the current situation in China, I also choose Qiuyang. Because without poetry and distance, we are still alive after all, but if we give up our efforts to catch up, we are doomed to be abandoned by this cruel society. As teacher Wan Weigang said, he likes the inventor of washing machine very much. No matter how much money the inventor earns, he likes it, because his invention liberates some female workers from heavy housework. And each of us will save ourselves from the edge of backwardness through our own efforts. This is the real meaning of Professor Liu Qing's last sentence: We should be great instead of great.