Basically, Chinese people are not sensitive to the security protection of personal information, and state organs and laws do not pay enough attention to it. Although it has been improved, it is still far from strict protection.

We have seen constant reminders from relevant departments: 1. The education department said that college students should pay attention to protecting their information from being leaked and not transferring money on ATM machines;

2. The public security department suggested that it is best not to answer any calls from 170/ 17 1;

3. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said that it is necessary to strictly implement real-name certification;

Ironically, Associate Professor Tsinghua University was cheated of 6.5438+0.76 million yuan. In this case, the precise timing of the fraudster makes people "admire"-the associate professor just sold a suite, and the fraudster called to say that your house transaction is suspected of tax evasion and you have to pay taxes. Then accurately reported the details of the associate professor's transaction. As a result, associate professor Gao Fei and Tsinghua, who graduated from Peking University, both fell into the trap.

Even the real tax authorities can't do it so quickly and master the information so accurately. While people are amazed, they should not just ask: Why did the associate professor know the details of her house sale just after she left the store? Who betrayed her information?

I haven't seen the safety tips from the housing transaction department and the tax department this time. However, it is of little significance not to prompt. Prompting will only tell good and law-abiding people that all our personal information has been leaked and is transparent to fraudsters. In the face of pervasive fraudsters, we Xiao Pi citizens are basically powerless to resist.