Debate speech 1

(The debater takes his seat)

Dear teachers and classmates, good evening. This is the third session of the first "Debate Competition for College Students" in Beihai Campus of xxxx University of Science and Technology. I am the executive chairman of this competition.

In order to make this competition go smoothly, let the debaters compete at an ideal level. Before the competition, please set the communication tools such as mobile phones to vibrate or mute.

Let me announce the discipline of the venue:

1. Don't interrupt the debater at will during the debate.

Personal attacks are not allowed, and both sides of the debater need to respect each other.

3. Except that "Hello, judges" must be said at the beginning of the debate, the rest can be omitted.

In the competition, the position of the debater cannot be changed.

When the two sides meet in the debate, one side must sit down after speaking and the debater of the other side should stand up before speaking.

6. In the last 30 seconds of each debate, the Executive Chairman will announce that the sound and placard prompts will stop after the time is over.

7. Both sides of the debater have limited time in each link. Please try to control your applause so as not to affect the performance of the debater.

Let me introduce the judges present today. They are _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Let me introduce you to both sides of today's debate. Now sitting on my right is the debater, not the team. Their view is "". Sitting on my left is the opposing debater, not the team. Their view is "". Let's ask the debaters of each team to introduce themselves. First of all, please welcome those in favor, and then please welcome those against.

What is the final result? Let's wait and see! Now I declare this debate officially open.

The competition is divided into five parts:

The first link: the stage of argumentation and refutation.

A. First of all, please make a three-minute opening speech for the debate on a positive side.

B: Please ask the opposing side to refute the positive argument. No arguments are allowed during this period, and the speaking time is one minute and thirty seconds.

C. Next, please ask the opposing side to make an opening debate and speak for three minutes.

D. please refute the negative argument with two positive arguments. No debate is allowed during the period, and the speaking time is one minute and thirty seconds.

After the pros and cons are finished, you can talk about some related topics. Be concise, remember not to be one-sided. )

Thank you for your wonderful speeches. Next is the debate →

The second link: attack and defense stage.

At this stage, the attacker asks questions and the defender answers. Those who are selected to answer questions are not allowed to avoid questions, but they can ask questions and the two sides speak alternately. The questioner and the questioner speak for one minute and thirty seconds respectively. When one party runs out of time, the other party can continue to speak or abstain. First of all, please ask questions with three arguments in the front, and choose three arguments or four arguments in the back to answer at will;

Next, please ask the opposing side to ask questions in three debates, and choose the positive three debates or four debates to answer at will; Next, please ask questions in the positive four debates, and choose to answer in the negative three debates or the four debates at will; Next, please ask the opposing side to ask questions in four debates, and choose the positive three debates or four debates to answer at will.

Any opponent's debater makes a summary of attack and defense, and the speaking time is one minute and thirty seconds. Any debater in the square will make an offensive and defensive summary, and the speech time is one minute and thirty seconds.

Thank you for your wonderful debate. Next comes the best part of the debate →

The third link: the stage of free debate.

In this session, the two sides take turns to speak. First, the cumulative time of each side should not exceed 5 minutes. Only one debater can speak for each team at a time. Any debater who stands up will be regarded as the speaker's speech, and when he sits down, it will be regarded as the end of the speech, and the other party will start to speak. Secondly, after one party runs out of time, the other party can continue to speak or abstain. (If one side has been confronted with the debater of the other side and the debater has been standing, the host should prompt that "when the two sides are confronted, one side must sit down after speaking, and the debater must stand up before speaking." )

First of all, please ask any affirmative debater to start (speak).

Thanks for the wonderful debate, and then the debate →

The fourth link: the conclusion stage. First of all, please ask any debater of the other side to make a 4-minute summary statement.

Thank you for your wonderful presentation. Next, please invite any debater on the positive side to make a final statement for 4 minutes.

Thanks for the wonderful statement of the affirmative debate, followed by the debate →

The fifth link: the judges' questioning stage (unlimited time).

Please welcome the judges. Thank you for your wonderful questions. Next, it's time for the judges to leave and evaluate the results. Please ask the staff to receive the judges' score sheet, and the selection results will be announced later.

While waiting for the results of the selection, the audience sitting here must have their own views or doubts about today's debate and the debates just now. In the next question-and-answer session of the audience, the debaters could not avoid the question. Please raise your hand so that I can see you. (If there is a classmate who has been asking questions at the scene and doesn't give other students who raise their hands a chance to answer, the host can say, "This classmate's question is very sharp, but I hope you can give other students with questions a chance to listen to their thoughts, ok?" After the fair selection by the jury, the results of this debate have come out:

Let me announce the result of this debate:

Champion: Best debater:

Debate speech part two

The principle of debating eloquence

Debate is an important part of litigation. Except for a few cases, lawyers participated in the litigation debate. The status of lawyers in litigation is different from other participants in litigation and has its particularity. Lawyers' eloquence in the debate should not only follow the basic principles of various lawsuits, but also have their own unique principles. These principles are:

First, the principle of seeking truth from facts.

Seeking truth from facts is one of the basic ideological lines and fine traditions of the work of our party and government. The principle of seeking truth from facts is also one of the basic principles that our lawyers should abide by. Lawyers' eloquence in the debate should abide by this principle. The principle of seeking truth from facts requires lawyers to seek truth from facts, based on objective facts, not falsifying facts, not exaggerating facts, and not concealing or narrowing facts.

Second, the principle of debating according to law.

Arguing according to law is also a principle that lawyers should abide by when arguing eloquence. Including the following main contents: (1) It is a lawyer's right to participate in the debate, and lawyers must exercise their right to debate according to law. (2) In the debate, lawyers must perform certain obligations according to law, and lawyers should also perform all the debating obligations that the parties should perform according to law. (3) The analysis made in the lawyer's debate, or the opinions put forward, must conform to the law and have a legal basis.

Third, the principle of safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.

This principle means that lawyers should safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of clients. According to this principle, the parties can ask lawyers to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, and lawyers should also take the initiative to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Lawyers protect the legitimate rights and interests of clients through various channels and methods, among which eloquence in debate is a major aspect.

Fourth, debate the principle of equality.

This principle is the guideline for lawyers to carry out defense activities. Including the following main contents: (1) Both sides in the debate are equal. (2) The lawyers of both parties and the parties have equal status in the debate, and the opportunities for debate are also equal. (3) Lawyers of both sides have equal status in the debate.

Fifth, safeguard the principle of national sovereignty.

This principle is the norm that China lawyers must abide by in foreign-related debates. According to the laws of China, lawyers in China can act as agents for foreign parties in foreign-related litigation.

In this case, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties is consistent with safeguarding the sovereign interests of the country. The legality of foreign rights and interests mentioned here includes: (1) rights and interests must be recognized and protected by China's domestic laws; (2) Rights and interests must be recognized and protected by international treaties signed by our government; (3) Rights and interests must be recognized and protected by international practices recognized by our government. China lawyers' foreign-related debates meet the above three conditions, namely, safeguarding China's sovereignty. The foreign party is not in the interest of the above situation, and our lawyer should not defend it.

Article 3 of the debate speech

Please keep quiet at the scene. Our debate is about to begin.

(Quiet) Hello, everyone, this is the scene of the xxxx (theme) debate. Welcome to visit. The theme of this debate is "xxxxxxxxxx".

Let me introduce the judges present. They are-next, I will introduce the debaters on both sides of this debate. The square debater is the representative of xx Department.

They are arguing with xxx in the affirmative, and they are arguing with xxX in the affirmative-(specifically, if the informal large-scale competition is informal, the introduction can be ignored, depending on the requirements of the specific superiors). Their view is that the opposing party is the same as above. I declare the first X Debate Competition of XX School officially started. Now enter the first stage: (just follow the instructions below, and the time will be arranged according to your outline requirements)

(1) At the opening presentation stage, please ask the affirmative to speak for 2 minutes and 30 seconds [indicating the affirmative to speak] [After the speech] please ask the opposing party to speak for 2 minutes and 30 seconds.

(2) Offensive and defensive stage (6 minutes for public debate, 3 minutes for each team).

1, positive dichotomy chooses anti-dichotomy or third dichotomy for one-on-one public debate 1 min 30 seconds.

2. For the opposing party's second debate, choose the positive second debate or three debates for one-on-one public debate 1 minute 30 seconds.

3. Positive three debates, choose negative two debates or three debates one-on-one public debate 1 minute 30 seconds.

4. For the three opposing arguments, choose two arguments squared or three arguments of one-on-one public argument 1 minute 30 seconds 5. Summary of first-party arguments and attack arguments 1 min 30 seconds.

6, the other side a debate summary 1 minute 30 seconds attack and defense rules:

The questioner controls the questioning time, can ask reasonable and clear questions related to the topic, and can stop the respondents' answers at any time.

(2) During the debate time, the questioner should ask questions, and may not excuse himself or extend the inquiry results, otherwise it will be considered illegal. When the questioner puts forward his own argument or extends his speech, the respondent has the right to ask him to stop.

The questioner should answer any question raised by the questioner, but when the question is obviously unreasonable, the questioner can explain the reasons and refuse to answer.

Respondents can ask the questioner to repeat their questions, but they must not be malicious, otherwise it will be considered illegal.

(5) Respondents are not allowed to ask questions to the questioner, otherwise it will be regarded as illegal.

⑥ When the respondent asks a counter-question, the questioner can ask him to stop and refuse to answer.

(3) Free debate stage [the other side starts first] (the debate time is 8 minutes, and the cumulative time of each team is 4 minutes)

1, the cumulative time of the other party is 4 minutes.

2.4-minute free debate rules are affirmative:

(1) The total time for free debate is * * * 8 minutes, and each team has 4 minutes.

(2) Free debate must be conducted alternately.

When the free debate begins, any opposing team member will stand up first to speak. After the end, any member of the team should speak immediately, and both sides take turns to speak until the time of both sides runs out.

(3) Free debate time, the order, quantity and time of each debater are unlimited.

(4) When a team has 30 seconds left to speak, there will be a whistle prompt, and when the team runs out of speaking time, there will be two whistle prompts, and the team should stop speaking immediately.

⑤ If one team runs out of time to speak and the other team still has time, the debater of that team can continue to speak until the team runs out of time.

⑥ Free debate is an important stage to test the overall cooperation ability of a team and the strength of each debater.

The debater should make full use of this time, strengthen his argument concisely and clearly, and refute the other side's argument tactfully and forcefully. If it's just an empty attack, or deliberately avoiding each other's questions and opinions, or if there are language errors and empty games, it will affect the performance of the team.

(4) In the summary statement stage, make a summary statement for the opposing four debates for 3 minutes, and make a summary statement for the positive four debates for 3 minutes.

(5) The audience asks questions

1, each team can ask 3 spectators, and each spectator can only ask 1 question.

2. The questions asked by the audience must be related to the topic and reasonable. When the question is unreasonable, the respondent can refuse to answer. The audience was disqualified from asking questions, but the opportunity to ask questions continued, and this opportunity was reserved for other audiences.

(six) the statistical results and opinions of the judges

(7) The host announces the results of the competition.

(eight) the host announced the end of the game.

Article 4 of the debate speech

Hello, teachers, judges and students!

Welcome to the debate contest hosted by the 14th Middle School Students' Association.

Before the competition starts, first of all, I declare the venue discipline and competition rules:

First, the presentation stage: We advocate impromptu presentation, and the quotations should be appropriate. In the presentation stage, the two sides debate first, then the two sides debate first, and then the two sides argue twice and argue three times, while refuting each other's views, they make supplementary statements on their own views.

Second, the closing statement stage: the time is 3 minutes, and the two sides will make closing statements in four arguments.

Third, other precautions:

1, don't interrupt others at will during the debate;

2. Personal attacks are not allowed;

3. Respect the judgment of the chairman and the judges;

4. We advocate the use of Putonghua by debaters, and give appropriate points to those who use Putonghua;

5. Except that "Hello, Chairman, Judges, Everyone" must be said at the beginning of the debate, the rest can be omitted.

6. In the debate, debaters can use props, charts and objects as auxiliary means to strengthen their statements.

7. In the competition, the position of the debater cannot be changed.

The topic of this debate is whether it is a loss to be an honest person.

Pro: It's not a loss to be an honest person.

Against: It's not a loss to be an honest person.

Now let me introduce both sides of today's debate.

In favor: one debater: two debaters: three debaters: four debaters:

Against: one debater: two debaters: three debaters: four debaters:

Moderator: Next, the debate begins. First of all, we welcome the four-minute positive debate.

Moderator: OK, just now, I made a positive statement of my views. Now let's take a look at how the opposing party made a statement. Please speak for each other for 4 minutes!

Moderator: Thank you for your wonderful statement.

After the first wonderful debate, the pros and cons are well-founded and evenly matched. Let the pros and cons refute each other, each team ***8 minutes.

Moderator: Just now, the arguments of the debaters on both sides were very exciting, and both sides were bound to win. The summary statement made by the fourth debater in various aspects is often more important. Let's start with four opposing arguments, please take 3 minutes!

Moderator: Thank you! Now, please make a concluding speech for the four arguments, and the time is also 3 minutes, please!

Moderator: Before the scores are announced, please let the judges on the spot comment on today's debate. Please welcome everyone.

Moderator: Now I announce that the debater of this competition is: the debater of the team team won the championship of this competition and is also the champion of this competition. The team is:

Moderator: OK, thank you for your wonderful debate.

The fifth debate speech

The external composition of debating eloquence

The external composition of debating eloquence mainly includes language (pronunciation, language), posture (expression, manners), psychology (concrete application of psychological laws) and others (space application).

(1) language

The language of lawyer's argument refers to the spoken language, that is, oral expression. Lawyers should attach importance to the scientificity and artistry of oral English. Science refers to the composition mechanism of spoken language? -Language usage rules. Artistry refers to the ways and skills of using spoken English. The former is unique to spoken language, while the latter is quite similar to written language.

① Phonetics

Stylistically, spoken language is spoken language. Although there are a lot of expressions and actions in oral expression, pronunciation is the first communication form of oral expression. As an oral expression of court debate, it is natural to attach importance to the research and application of phonetics.

Lawyers argued about the beauty of pronunciation. The harmony and unity of good debate content and good pronunciation form will form a special force and make the debate achieve good results.

The phonetic forms of court debate mainly include timbre, stressed intonation and rhythm.

Timbre. Any kind of oral expression, its material material? -? Phonetics has a minimum requirement, which is correct, clear and pleasing to the ear.

Lawyers' arguments are no exception. There is not a one-to-one correspondence between Chinese phonetics and characters. Due to different regions, phonetic differences (dialects) generally exist in Chinese. In order to avoid the confusion and misunderstanding of the audience's listening, lawyers should pay attention to pronunciation during the debate, and strive to be correct, clear and as pleasant as possible.

Lawyers should use Putonghua in the debate, which plays an important role in the debate of special courts. The timbre of a person's natural state has innate factors, but the acquired power can change it to some extent. Learning the correct pronunciation method to make the timbre beautiful can greatly enhance the power of language expression.

Stress and intonation. Language is a tool to express people's thoughts and feelings. The focus of thoughts and feelings, in oral expression, is the stress of language and sound. If there is no pressure, the focus of thoughts and feelings cannot be expressed in oral form. Intonation (tone) is also one of the phonetic forms to express different thoughts and feelings. Proper use of stress and intonation can enhance the emotional color of language. Form a harmonious and pleasant language in hearing, highlight the expression center, and play the role of emphasis and persuasion.

Lawyers debate right and wrong, and praise and criticism are very clear. Correct and proper use of phonetic stress and intonation skills is of great help to lawyers' debate. Rhythm is also an important part of oral expression skills. Oral expression is relaxed, urgent, delayed, intermittent and ups and downs, which is very important for lawyers to argue. Slow but not urgent, will make the audience always in a state of relaxation and inhibition, distracted and unable to lift their spirits, thus affecting the expression effect. With the ups and downs of thoughts and feelings, we should relax; It is the lawyer's need to adjust the speed of speech according to the needs of expression, so as to be fast and slow, moderate and alternating.

In the oral expression of lawyer's debate, we should also pay attention to the proper use of pause and the continuation of oral English. Pause is not only the needs of lawyers, but also the needs of listeners. The oral pause during the debate can leave room for the listener to reflect and think, and provide a certain space for the exchange of thoughts and feelings between lawyers and listeners. In the pause, we should keep the continuity of language situations, grasp the appropriate opportunity and connect the preceding with the following. Lawyer's debate is a comprehensive use of various language expressions, including narration, debate, criticism, explanation and lyricism. Choosing different skills according to different expressions is one of the important contents of lawyers' debating language skills.

② Language

Another important content of lawyer's argument language is the use of spoken language. The spoken language used by lawyers in the debate is not only sound (pronunciation), but also meaningful. In this respect, lawyers can learn a lot from speaking and writing. For example, how to use words, how to use rhetoric, how to use narrative, discussion, explanation, lyric and other languages, as well as the use of various specific language skills (intonation, opening and closing, contrast, humor, induction, exploration, reduction to absurdity, disproof, foil) and so on.

In a word, good language expression is very important for lawyers to argue. At present, the lawyer's debate in China is basically in a state of scripted, plain and straightforward, and monotonous expression. One of the reasons is the contempt for skills. This further illustrates the importance of learning and training oral expression skills to improve the level of lawyers' debate.

(2) Situation

Modern science shows that body language, like ordinary language, is self-contained and understandable. The gesture language of lawyer's argument includes tool language,

Expressions, eyes, gestures, etc. The judicial nature of lawyer's debate determines the tone of his gesture language, which should be solemn, sincere and distinct, and should not be exaggerated, grandstanding, mechanically imitated or impulsive.

① instrument

Instrument is composed of body, clothes, dress, expression, posture, etc. The beauty of appearance is one of the important factors for the psychological fit between the audience and the lawyer, which has prepared a good start for a successful debate. The lawyer's appearance should be solemn and steady, not frivolous and flashy; Be neat and generous, not sloppy, not over-decorated; It should be natural harmony, not imitation.

A person's appearance and appearance are endowed by talent. Height, thinness, beauty and ugliness all exist objectively, and lawyers don't have to worry or pretend to cover them up. However, if lawyers can choose their clothes and adjust their manners according to their body, appearance and status, it will be beneficial to the debate. If thick clothes and fancy clothes appear in court, the consequences will be unimaginable. The lawyer's gfd is not only reflected in his body, but also in his manners, conversation, self-cultivation and temperament. The latter is often subject to sexual domination and can be artificially controlled. Strengthening the cultivation of morality, quality and tolerance is an important means to increase the aesthetic feeling of appearance.

② Expression

The opposition to the court debate is very strong. The content of the debate is closely related to the rights and interests of the parties; Or a lawyer's noble moral and legal responsibility. Therefore, the court debate always has a strong emotional color. Although the debate venue requires lawyers to be highly objective and calm, language confrontation is always accompanied by strong emotional confrontation.

Tell the truth. Language is the main tool to express thoughts and feelings, but it is not the only tool. In addition, there are physical expressions. Expression is a complex physiological phenomenon, which can be unconsciously revealed naturally or consciously under the control of reason. Using expressions to enhance the persuasiveness of the debate, or to examine the expression of the other party and capture hidden thoughts that are more real and subtle than language, is helpful to the success of the debate, and it is also one of the important contents for lawyers to master the situational skills of the debate.

③ Eyes

In situational language, eyes are the most convincing. In court debate, the expression of eyes plays a very important role. Some people say that eyes are a special language for human beings to convey spiritual information. Through this window of the soul, lawyers can grasp a lot of potential information, express rich and varied thoughts and feelings, influence and infect the audience, and obtain the best debate effect.

Correct use of eyes and eyes can eliminate psychological confrontation, communicate emotions and gain the understanding and trust of the other party; Can show just tolerance and make criminals feel awe; It can concentrate the audience's attention, help the language to create a good debate atmosphere and enhance the appeal of the debate; Can gain insight into each other's psychology, improvise and adopt the correct debate method; Be able to grasp the constantly emerging new information, seize the rapidly changing and fleeting opportunities, and revise the contents and methods of the debate; It can awaken the conscience of the audience, expand the connotation of the debate and increase the aesthetic value of the debate.

Obviously, as an auxiliary means of audio language, eyes and eyes are by no means dispensable for lawyers to argue. Whether you admit it or not, whether you know it or not, its important role will always be reflected.

④ Gesture

Gesture is a special and important posture skill. The lawyer's argument is not static and purely oral. During the debate, with the ups and downs of feelings, a series of body movements will occur, and gestures are one of them.

Some people call gestures sign language. Deaf people use this as the main tool to communicate their thoughts and feelings, while normal people use pronunciation as the main means to express their feelings, and at the same time use gestures as an important auxiliary tool.

Gestures play an active role in court debates because of their concreteness, vividness, large image and wide range of actions.

A, gestures can emphasize the key points that need to be highlighted in the debate;

B, gestures can mobilize the debate atmosphere and break the boring, monotonous and boring debate situation;

C. Gestures can create beautiful images and enhance the attractiveness and persuasiveness of debates.

Gestures have certain procedures and form their own unique system. It is a social custom that a certain gesture has a certain meaning. Therefore, gestures can not only be widely understood, but also widely used, with certain application rules.

The use of gestures in lawyers' debates should follow the following principles:

First, the use of gestures should pay attention to its standardization. It should help to express the content of the debate; It should be easy for the audience to accept and understand, and they should not create inventions at will.

B, the use of gestures should be appropriate, accurate, concise, powerful and natural; Don't overdo it, don't pretend, don't exaggerate.

C, the use of gestures should be coordinated with the debate environment. The range of action should not be too large, and strive to achieve natural harmony.