The only advantage is that it is suitable for candidates with weak cultural courses to go to a higher school. Generally speaking, it is equivalent to "a school with three grades in junior college, two or even one in three grades, and one or even one class in two grades". However, from the perspective of employment and survival, it is better to go to the ordinary three books than the one responsible above. There are many people who hold the view that "I would rather go to a junior college than take charge of it".
In my opinion, if candidates choose to enter the university through cultural management, they can increase their opportunities for learning and development. Their success does not lie entirely in their achievements in cultural classes. Since it is difficult to improve personal culture courses, they will find that there are many opportunities for cultural management in universities, and it is easy to position themselves and change themselves. My son is an example. His high school grades are average, and there is no hope of improvement. He can go to three books at most and has no personal confidence. However, after being admitted to the university through cultural management, I regained my confidence and advantages, and this year's postgraduate entrance examination results were very ideal. It is true that many candidates have delayed their foundation in their early years and almost failed in the college entrance examination, but learning is better than not learning well. Although literature management is a second-or third-rate major, it is also a helpless choice. What's more, many candidates are more and more suitable for learning with their age, and parents and schools should give them opportunities for development.