In the twenty-sixth year of Guangxu, Emperor Guangxu established himself as Qin with him. Huang Xie wrote a letter saying that Zhao Qihao, the king of Qin, asked Qin Chu to reach an agreement with this country. Huang Xieqin, who showed outstanding talent for the first time, may be appointed as a left disciple and a prince after returning home. Twenty-seven years later, he became a pledge of the Qin Dynasty. Make the map of Chu serve Prince Qin. [2]' Biography of Qu Yuan':' Huang Xie was betrothed to Chu, and Chu made Xie and the prince complete their vows in Qin, and Qin stayed here for several years. King Chu Xiang is ill, and the prince can't return. The king of Qin said,' Let Fu Cha, the king of Chu, inquire about the king of Chu first, and then return to the picture.' Huang Xie plotted for the king of Chu. It is better to die in Qin and go out with the messenger. Please stop and treat it as death. "[2] Left-wing Prince Xie," Waiting for the Prince to enter "for ten years. It can be seen that the picture on the left is a near minister, not a courtier. Huang Xie's position and role in the history of Chu is far greater than Qu Yuan's. According to historical records, when Huang Xie was a leftist, he was not an "important minister in charge of internal affairs and foreign affairs" [1] "Biography of Qu Yuan": "King Gaolie took the left picture as his spiritual hiding place, and sealed it as Wu and Spring." [2] Therefore, some people think that the left picture is "second only to the ritual of Lingyin". Teacher Duan Xizhong said, "Chun Shen Jun risked his life to save the prince from returning to China and become king, which is a great achievement. Therefore, he does not necessarily follow the usual class promotion, but has the meaning of leapfrog. " "History of Han Dynasty": "The kingdom of kings today includes Zhu, Ling Yin, Sima and Dian Ling". "It seems that your subordinates are not leftists." "Therefore, I doubt the view that left-wing officials are second only to Ling Yin, but I think that the promotion from the left to Ling Yin in spring is a special reward, not a step-by-step promotion." "[Paragraph 5 Xi Zhongshi Chu] is credible. 3. The picture on the left can be the teacher of the prince. History shows that Zuo Xie is the "gift of the prince" and Zuo Tu Qu Yuan may have served as the "teacher of the prince". There is a circumstantial evidence. You can be a teacher, and then you can grow up; You can grow up and then you can become a monarch. " [6] "Biography of Chun Shen Jun" His teacher is Fu, his leader is an official, and his leader is Jun ... So although he has been in the Chu family for a few years, his teacher is shy. Or it can be explained that although he is young, he served as a dragon. 4. Bronze Zuo Tuge teacher Liu Binhui said: "1983 was unearthed in Xiaoyao Township, Nanxian County, Shandong Province. Mild disability, length 13.2 cm. Hu Shu has three inscriptions: Zuo Tuge. This is Chu's left wing. About the late Warring States period. " [7 "Warring States Policy" 8226; Han Ce II P368-369] This bronze ge is not a fixture in the unearthed cultural relics combination, and it is not beautifully made. Therefore, some people suspect that it is not necessarily the "official" of the left, but the "pawn" of the ordinary left. It is difficult to determine right or wrong at present. "Left [up and down] disciple" is in the tomb of Zeng Houyi. At first, Mr. Qiu Xigui speculated according to the written materials of Zeng Houyi's tomb: "The suspicion of' left [upper and lower] disciples' can be found in the left disciples such as Notes on Chu Ci and Notes on the Book of Rites." [8] Qiu Xigui's Ode to the Book of Rites Orange No.7+0979. P25-3 1] Mr. Tang questioned Mr. Qiu Xigui's "Left [Ascending to Heaven] disciple" and "made further exploration", and put forward the original word "[Ascending to Heaven]" and immediately ascended to heaven ". The ancient sound of the word "Sheng" is the same as "Deng" and can be used as a festival. Therefore, the "left upper and lower disciples" are "left boarding disciples"; "Left picture" is the provincial name of "left picture". [1 Research on Chu Bronzes P48-57] Teacher Zhao Kuifu also suggested that "Ascension to Heaven" is a variant of "Deng" and should be pronounced as "Deng". [9] Some people think that "Zuo Zheng Yin" and "Right" were titles before the mid-Warring States period, while "Left [Ascending] Disciple" and "Right [Ascending] Disciple" were titles in the late Warring States period. In addition, Chu's "seeking the shade" and "starting and ending disciples" are all "pedestrians" in the Central Plains countries. [9 "Historical Records" People's Literature Publishing House, 2002 Edition] The teacher said: "First,' Left'
[10 Zhou Jianzhong Biography of Chu Family and Qu Yuan 200502] Song Yu's Disciples on the written materials of the tomb of Zeng Houyi in Suixian County 1. The name of "Disciple" is Song Yu Cultural Relics: Song Yu was arrested together with his disciples in Yuan [0700]. A new probe into Qu Fu's "Left Disciple" and "Disciple": The doctor's apprentice served the King of Chu [Qu Yuan and his time]. The "lothario" in the two poems should be the same person. In, Song Yu became indissoluble bond with Yuan Yuan's disciple, so this disciple should be a person's name, not an official name. Moreover, there was no official name with the suffix "zi" in the pre-Qin period. Teacher Tang's "apprentice" was added by people who didn't understand the original meaning of "apprentice". Historical Records 8226; Shan Li's annotation in Biographies of Qu Yuan and Jia Sheng mistook Deng Tu for a person's name. [1] Then, according to Tang Lao's original intention, the word "Yu Zi" of the "apprentice" in Qu Yuan's Official Performance Test and Song Yu and His Apprentice Caught Yuanyuan was deleted first, which means that "apprentice" is the formal title. It became: "Song Yu and his apprentice were caught in Yuanyuan". Obviously, this is inconsistent with the significance of literary criticism. Visible, Tang Laozhi's theory of "more and more children at home" does not have sufficient evidence, or that Shan Li interpreted "apprentice" as "name". "Fu" can only be reconciled by interpreting "disciple" as a person's name. If it is changed to "fishing fu" according to Tang Lao's original intention, it is not only meaningless, but also inconsistent with the text: "The lothario is not. His wife has stubble in her ears, teeth in her lips, rolls for grain, scabies and hemorrhoids. The apprentice was very happy and gave birth to five sons. Teacher Mao Zedong also said, "The disciple married an ugly daughter-in-law, but the disciple has always been loyal to her". See "Ancient Wen Yuan" edited by Jin Chen, and read "The Disciple" by Song Yu. It can be seen that "Disciple" is a personal name and a special name, which cannot be changed to a general official name. This is not an abstruse and vague word. For more than two thousand years, it has been recognized that "loser" is a person's name. If there is no prejudice, the word "zi" which means "person" in the literature will never be forcibly deleted, paving the way for the view that "apprentice" is "official title". Since "apprentice" is a person's name, Tang Lao's "doctor", the general name of his rank, "apprentice" and the nickname of his position are "apprentice of the doctor" [1]. This "apprentice" is the "doctor" around him after moving to Chen. As can be seen from the Selected Works, Song Yu was arrested in Yuan Yuan with a disciple. Only in King Xiang of Chu [1 1 fisherman P 12 1] was it found that the Selected Works was probably the earliest extant work of Song Yu. Song Yu met King Xiang of Chu for the first time as an adult. He used "fishing" as a metaphor for politics and urged King Xiang of Chu to govern Chu with virtue, virtue, benevolence, benefit and punishment. Textual research on Teacher Liu Gang: Around 284 BC, Yuan Huan returned to Chu, lived in seclusion near Chen Ying, and took fishing as his profession. According to this inference, Song Yu was "arrested" from Yuan Huan. When he returned to Chu from Yuanhuan, that is, after 284 BC, or later, the place where he was "arrested" should be in Chenying. " Teacher Liu Gang thinks: "Song Yu was born in the third year of King Xiang of Chu" [12 "Fisherman"] According to Liu's research, "Song Yu was caught" was a small fashion at that time. In 2000, Song Yu snubbed his apprentice "Xuanzhou Fishing" with "Fishing King". The apprentice told Song Yu that he was "lewd" in front of Wang Xiang. The king said, "I'm not horny, what do you think?" If you say something, you will stop. Without a word, retreat. "If this song doesn't make sense, the king of Chu will fire him. It shows that King Xiang of Chu and Song Yu haven't been in contact for a long time and don't know him yet. Song Yu said: "Her employer's daughter has been on the wall for three years, but she hasn't made any promises yet. "Song Yu is a carefree, good-looking unmarried youth. It can be seen that Ode to Eros and Ode to Eros are both about Song Yu's first encounter with King Xiang of Chu, and they are closely related. Song Yu's kindness won the favor of King Xiang of Chu. " So the king of Chu called it grace, and Song Yu did not retreat. [110755-7900p79-80] "Analysis of Mao Zedong's Reading Notes Literature", saying that "Dr. Qin Zhanghua was around at that time"; What's more, being a concubine in the poor lane of South Chu is enough for the king's words? "This" Dr. Qin Zhanghua "may be
It shows that "Changhua" is already the land of Qin, which happened after "the capital of Chu moved eastward". Secondly, only when the capital of Chu moved to "Chencheng" and "Zhanghua" was in the southwest of Chu can it be called "South Chu". So it can be used as circumstantial evidence that Chu moved eastward. What's more, it was not the aristocratic gathering places such as Ying, Yan and Hubei that moved, but the "son of the master laughed" and "messed up". It is the "Caixia Sheep City" near the "Chencheng" in the northeast of Chu, which was unknown before Du Yingdong moved. This also implies that when Song Yu became king of Chu Xiang, Chu had moved eastward to Chencheng. See my ode to a lascivious disciple 13 for details. Teacher Tang said: "Maybe the apprentice written by Song Yu is someone else's right apprentice, not Huang Xie, the left apprentice;" Secondly, Song Yu is more likely to tell lies by innuendo. If you are not a real person, you will make a big fuss with this short official title. " 1 "Ode to the Disciple" "Song Yu's' apprentice' is not a real person", which is very likely. But Tang Lao deleted the word "son" of "apprentice" and judged it as "right apprentice"; The left disciple Huang Xie was enlarged into the left disciple Huang Xie to adapt to the view that "being an apprentice is an official name" Such "addition and deletion" seems inappropriate. Summary: 1. The fisherman in the left picture is a doctor. One of the characteristics of the picture on the left is a diplomat or prince, who is knowledgeable and good at rhetoric. There is no data to prove that "the left picture" is a "provincial name". 2. The "left disciple" in Zeng Houyi's tomb is still difficult to connect with the "left disciple". Chu official system is complex, and a large number of Chu official names in unearthed objects are unknown at present. 3. The "disciple" in Song Yufu is a person's name. This apprentice and the original apprentice, and later the "doctor" around Wang Xiang. Their duties have nothing to do with "apprentices". Second, the apprentice should not be "Zuo Huang Xie" and "Song Yuji". Meng Changjun's travel country is an important basis for those who say "apprentice", that is, "leftist". The original "Travel Notes of Meng Changjun" Meng Changjun traveled to [5] countries, arrived in Chu, and presented an elephant bed. Win the apprentice, send it straight, don't want to do it. Gongsun Shu, a teacher, met him and said, "I am a disciple. I'll send him directly to the elephant bed. A bed is like a thousand dollars, but you hurt it for a second, which is not enough to sell your wife. It is enough to make the servant do nothing, but the ancestors have swords and are willing to offer them. " Sun said, "Promise." As soon as I saw Meng Changjun, I said, "Did you sleep with Chu Xiang?" Meng Changjun said, "Of course." Sun wrote: "I hope you won't accept it." Meng Changjun said, "What is it?" Qi Huangong said, "All five countries are related to the monarch. When the air is poor, there is a meaning of survival. The nobles of the five countries were bored with state affairs, honestly said the righteousness of the monarch and admired the honesty of the monarch. Today in Chu, you are like a bed. What will you do to the country where you haven't arrived yet? I hope you don't accept it. " Meng Changjun said, "No." Sun Zhu hurried away. Not yet. When I got to the boudoir, I called back and said, "It's good that there is no elephant bed in the suburbs. How high is today's ambition? " Gong Sunshu said, "I have a junior and an epee." Meng Changjun said, "What is it?" Gongsun Shu said, "I dare not enter the remonstrance gate. I will participate in the protest alone and enjoy it. " I am glad to hear the protest; I'm happy to admonish and stop your mistakes. Like a bed, the British don't want to climb, and Xu Shu takes the sword of his ancestors. "Meng Changjun said," good. Suffering? Gongsun Shu said, "I dare not. "1" Because of the publication of the book, it is said that those who have the name of promoting literature can stop, and those who have foreign private treasures are unwise. [14 "Fisherman"] This paper has created three characters: Meng Changjun, who is honest, generous, famous and overjoyed. * * * Garrison, quick thinking, selfish, complacent. English apprentice, humble and timid, does not seek merit, but seeks nothing. Miss Tang Bin.
Then' meet the guests and deal with the princes'. This is the responsibility of the "Left". Therefore. It can be proved that the "apprentice" who accepted Meng Changjun and sent him to the ivory bed was a "leftist" position; That is, Ceng Houyi was given the post of "Left and Right Disciple" to chariots and horses when he was buried, as recorded in the bamboo slips of Zeng Houyi's tomb. In addition, judging from the sentence "I am a believer in Britain", I should first introduce my official position and political status in the language environment when I talk to foreign guests during my mission, and I must never suddenly call "someone in Britain". Obviously, the "apprentice" in Song's travel notes is the same apprentice. It should all be official names, not names. Second, Meng Changjun made friends with Huang Xie, the "left disciple" of King Xiang of Chu. Therefore, the "apprentice" who went to the State of Chu at that time was probably the "leftist" Huang Xie at that time. Under the control of Qi's foreign policy, he ostensibly claimed to give you a "bed-like" expensive gift to perfuse foreign guests from all corners of the country. Play tricks from it. Say no to avoid attracting Qin's attention. [1] Teacher Tang doesn't seem to focus on the reading and analysis of the "text", so these "understandings" may violate the "intention and object of the ancients' argument". Test 1. Did the apprentice accept Meng Changjun? Gong, the master Ying's apprentice met, said, "I am Ying's apprentice, and I sent him directly to the elephant bed. A bed is like a thousand dollars, but you hurt it for a second, which is not enough to sell your wife. Feet can make servants do nothing, but ancestors have swords and they are willing to give them. [14 fisherman] "This is clearly a private transaction between Tu and Gong Shu. Lao Tang said: "Yu Changjun of the State of Qi has arrived in Chu, and it was Chu's' apprentice' who sent the elephant bed in the reception work. This "apprentice" who received him and sent him to the ivory bed is also a "leftist" position [1], and "the apprentice who should be" is not "speaking to foreign guests during the missionary period"; There is no "receiving Meng Changjun and sending him to the elephant bed". Therefore, Tang Lao's theory seems to be a misunderstanding of "Ode to a Disciple". Mr. Tang: "I want to ask, how can an ordinary official named' apprentice' temporarily change such a diplomatic plan about gift-giving because he is afraid of being responsible?" [1]- I'm afraid I have to "ask" the ancients who wrote this article! 2. What do you think of The First Step? Lao Tang said: "Judging from the expression' I am a minister, but I am a disciple of the British', I should first introduce my official position and political status in the language environment where I speak to foreign guests when I perform my duties, and I will never suddenly call others' British'. [1] If it is in the "language environment for receiving foreign guests", then this sentence by Tang Lao does make sense. However, to understand historical figures, we must put them in the social environment at that time. In foreign affairs and other activities in the pre-Qin period, humble people can call themselves "ministers" when talking with distinguished people, and distinguished people can be called "first step" or "monarch". For example, "Fisherman": "Gan Mao died in Qin, and met Perilla by chance and said,'. I don't deserve to be a minister today, so I abandoned Qin to go through customs. I want to clean the room and make a mat for my first step. Fortunately, there is no one suitable for me. Su Qin: Qi Wang: My name is Wang Wei as the first step; Song Yuji Gongsun Shu: I hope you don't accept it. The realization of this title in Lottie's lascivious Fu is no exception. "The Apprentice of Yingzhi" was also called "Minister" and "First Step" when he met Master Gongsun Shu, indicating that his social status was lower than that of public debate. "The Apprentice of Yingzhi" also made a little move that violated the decision of the King of Chu to offer an elephant bed. These humble words and deeds can't come from "Chu Zuo" 3. Is the "apprentice" in Evocation-Qu Yuan's reverie of "Evoking His Soul" the same as Fu Song? Tang Lao said, "Obviously, the' apprentice' in A New Interpretation of Qu Fu is Fu Song. It should be a formal name, not an inhuman name. "[1] this statement is also difficult to establish. Many surnames in the pre-Qin period came from official names, and "disciples" might be.
"Ying's apprentice from 0755 to 79000" is just a small official with a lower rank than the garrison. The "disciple" in Song Yufu is the "doctor" around Chu after he moved to Chen. Therefore, it cannot be said that both are official names, let alone the same. 4. There is no "big move". Lao Tang said "no" and Huang Xie said, "Left. Under the control of Qi's foreign policy, he ostensibly claimed to give you a "bed-like" expensive gift to perfuse foreign guests from all corners of the country. Play tricks from it. Say no, so as not to attract Qin's attention "[1] Britain's" unwillingness to go "is not premeditated to let people know. Our master, Gong Shu, did not hide the truth, and immediately told him, "Ying is dying, and we should protect our ancestors." Teacher Tang privately commented on Xu Li's "British behavior": Huang Xie, the left disciple, and "playing tricks". Not exactly. "Deviation from the original imagination is hard to convince. 5. The British Apprentice has nothing to do with Huang Xie. Teacher Tang said that the time when Huang Xie was appointed as the "left apprentice" of the King of Chu was basically the same. So, from Chu to Chu at that time, the "apprentice" who took the job was probably the "leftist" Huang Xie. [1] Teacher Liao Huajin has some doubts about this: "According to Records of the Historian and Qi Ce San, the King of Qi was out of the dynasty for 30 years, and after his recall, he' thanked his illness and retired from Xue' and never went abroad. Shortly after Meng Changjun's death, Wang Xinli of Qixiang. According to the Warring States policy, in the twenty-seventh year, Huang Xie was appointed as a prince in Qin, and it has been restored for twenty-two years. It can be seen that the "apprentice" who sent the elephant bed from Chu was not Huang Xie. " [15 Selected Works] We assume that Chun Shen Jun was killed by Li Yuan in the 25th year of King Gao Lie, at the age of about 60. In the first year of the fierce king, Chun Shen Jun was thirty-six years old. Wang Xiang is thirty-six, and Huang Xie is thirty-five. In the twenty-seventh year of Guangxu, Huang Xie, a leftist, was twenty-six when he served the prince in Qin. Huang Xie was about twenty-five years old when he stopped fighting in self-defense and took him to the State of Qin. Push forward 2 1 year, that is, the first 294 years, "abdicated as" and went to Wei. At this time, Huang Xie was still a kindergarten child. From the time point of view, it is impossible for leftist Huang Xie to meet Ren Qixiang's Meng Changjun. In terms of space, Tu is a "small official", which is different from the "Chen" of the left disciple Huang Xie. Not to mention, Huang Xie spent most of his time in the State of Qin serving the Prince. It can be seen that the apprentice should have nothing to do with "Left Yellow Evil". In fact, as long as it is based on the article Biography of Qu Yuan quoted by Teacher Tang: "However, if Wang Bei is afraid, defends his country and commits himself, and is defeated and killed, he will die." [1] It can be judged that "Meng Changjun conforms to the era of Huang Xie and is the" left wing "of King Xiang of Chu" is inconsistent. Meng Changjun was in a state of harmony mainly in the early days of King Chu Huaiwang and King Xiangqing. Huang Xie, who was appointed as the leftist in the 27th year of Wang Xiang, was not a contemporary. 6. "Apprentice", "Left Apprentice" and "Left Apprentice" are irrelevant. Teacher Tang said: "It can be proved that this apprentice who was accepted and sent to the elephant bed is the position of the' left apprentice'; That is, the post of the' Left [Up and Down] Disciple who sent horses and chariots at the funeral of Guangzhou He Junda recorded in the bamboo slips of Zeng Houyi's tomb. " [1] From the analysis of social status, the "deserving person" is lower than the official, so it will not be left behind. In terms of time, it was about 306 years ago that Meng Changjun became Qixiang. For example, the long county of Qi visited Chu, but most of Huang Xie did not.
It can be seen that Teacher Tang's "proof" was not successful. Historical textual research is the basis of historical research. Historical facts are distorted and the literature basis is insufficient. Everything after that is a building on quicksand. Tang Lao's prose "Qi Ce" not only lacks documentary basis, but also many historical facts are distorted, which is really unexpected for Mr. Tang who has a deep "primary school" background. Third, the apprentice should not be Qu Yuan. Teacher Liao Huajin said: "Seven strategies and three words' Wang Huai, Weibei and Meng Changjun'." Therefore, Meng Changjun respected Chu more and provided elephant beds. "Being an apprentice" must be Qu Yuan. "[199 1 February 15]. Liao did not research whether the possible time of "entering Chu" was related to Qu Yuan. Later, Teacher Zhao Kuifu said: "The disciple written in The Warring States Policy is Chu's left disciple. Who is this leftist? I thought it was Qu Yuan. " [9] This article "When it was tied in Shen Zhou for three years. A year ago, Qi, Chu, Yan, Zhao, Han and Chu jointly supported Gongsun Yan to form an alliance with Lu. This year, the five countries joined forces to attack the state of Qin, led by. Meng Changjun's trip to five countries happened just after the unification of Qi and five countries. Giving the ivory bed to Chu is an attempt to buy off the rulers of various countries to maintain their vertical position. [9] However, the time from Chu mentioned by Teacher Zhao is inconsistent with the historical records. The level of "Ying's apprentice" in Meng Changjun's Journey to the Country was lower than that of the left apprentice, so it would not be the time when Qi Changjun might "arrive in Chu" and Qu Yuan became the left apprentice. Is it possible for these two people to meet? Ren Qixiang time "Qin Ce II, Death and Qi": 365,438+00 years ago "Wang Jiunian, Jin. Both Zhang Yihe belong to Wei. Wei Wu, Chu harmed Zhang Yi and extended his life. Chu said to him, "Tian must die. I'm afraid one of Zhang Yi, Shou and Xue will be an enemy of Wei. Dai:' Can you ask a natural person to have it?' Zhao Yu said, "I want the prince to be himself." In 3 10, Tian Wen was named Gong Xue, indicating that Tian Wen inherited Gong Xue in 3 10. Chu is afraid of "being in the same phase as Wei", which shows that it is not in the same phase. From Zhao Siqi's desire to attack the Song and Qin Dynasties and Jia Ban's, it can be seen that: 20 "Qi believed in Korea, and Han Gongzi also" [2]. P340. At that time, Jixiang was the son of North Korea. The eighth chapter of Ma Dui's silk book Seven Strategies Three reads: "He entered Chu and Ye at the age of nine and stayed in Qin for three years." About 306 years ago, Meng Changjun became the circumstantial evidence of Qi Xiang. Teacher Chao Fulin said: "The so-called' three years of attacking Qin' refers to the three years that Meng Changjun fled Qin and contacted Qi Weihan to attack Qin, which is now 298-295. The following year, that is, the first 294 years, was the year of leaving Wei, and it was also the so-called "Wang abandoned" year in silk books. The first year of the so-called "nine-year-old attack on Chu" dates back to nine years, that is, the first 306 years from the 298 years before the Three Kingdoms attacked Qin. In 200 AD, Gan Mao, the prime minister of Qin, surrendered to Qi. The following year, Qin strengthened its relationship with Chu, and Chu "merged with Qin". Meng Changjun's plan to attack Chu began at this time. When we say that we attacked Chu at the age of nine, we can trace it back to 298 years before Qi, Han and Wei attacked Qin. There is also evidence that Gong Xue attacked Chu with Qi in Qi Ce. In the chapter, it is said that "in nine years, Qi was used as the Han and Wei Dynasties to attack Chu, and Wan and Ye were used as the Han and Wei Dynasties" and "Qi Ce"). In the first 294 years, the Tian family robbed the king and left. [Qi Ce] Conclusion: In the first 3 10 years, Tian Wen inherited Gong Xue, also known as Meng Changjun. About 306 years ago, he became Qi Xiang. After that, "Chu nine years, Qin three years", before 294, from Qi to Wei. During this period, I didn't have a chance to visit Chu. Therefore, "Meng Changjun traveled to five companies.
Sixteen years before Zhang Yi cheated Chu, Qu Yuan was left out in the cold. So in what year? Teacher Jiang Liangfu said, "It should have been wronged within 14 and 15 years." [19 Biography of Meng Changjun, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 1984], p. 57. In the fifteenth year of Wang Huai, the focus of the "battle" was "fighting for Qi to save Yan". : "Qi broken Yan, Zhao wants to save it. Le Yi said to the prince of Zhao, "If we attack Qi together, Qi will attack Zhao. It's best to get together with Hedong Yiyan. Zhao Hebei, Qihe East, Yan and Zhao are indisputable. This is the friendship between the two countries. Zhao Fuzhi, the land of Hedong is strong and the state of Yan is hated by the world. Everything must be done by the king. Because the whole world is broken. Wang Dao: "Good." It is the hatred of Hedong, Chu and Wei that benefits the 4-slip. Please cut qi to save Yan. [14]' Chronicle of the Six Kingdoms':' Qi people cut down Yan and took it, and the princes will try to save it. "On the condition of' six cities of Chu, Xu and Wei', Chu wants to exchange Wei's support at the expense of six cities and unite Wei and Zhao to' cut qi and save words'. This record is not necessarily accurate. But it reflects the historical fact that Chu wanted to unite with Wei to resist Qi for fifteen years. Fifteen years, "seven years in Shu, three years in South", "General Shibei conspired with Prince Ping to attack his son. It's hard to build for months. Qi swallowed, killed, and his son died. On the 30th, I will propose Guo Yan. " At this time, Chu Huaiwang wanted to "chop the swallow", but Qu Yuan probably wouldn't agree. The civil strife in the state of Yan was caused by the prince ceding the country to his son. This also provides an example for the ministers of Chu State that "entertaining Japan with loyal ministers" may lead to civil strife and harm the king and the country. Doctor Shangguan and others took this opportunity to "admire Qu Yuan together". Finally, "Wang nu, shun Qu Ping". Judging from the international situation and Qu Yuan's foreign policy about 16 years ago, Qu Yuan was left out in the cold after Qi Yan broke in fifteen years, but before Chu colluded with Zhao and Wei for the first time. 20 Tian Gengzi's "Chu Family" Conclusion: Qu Yuan left Wang Huai from 10 to 15. Ying's apprentice is not Qu Yuan, a left-wing apprentice. Qu Yuan was a leftist apprentice for ten to fifteen years. Meng Changjun succeeded to the throne as "Gong Xue" about 3 10 years ago; About 306 years ago, he became Qi Xiang. Even in the first 306 years, the first 3 14 years, Qu Yuan was ignored, and even became the "Meng Changjun Five, Arriving in Chu" of Qixiang. This further proves that the map of Deng Yingzhi in Qu Yuan's Year is by no means a legendary figure, and it can't be Qu Yuan's. Why did Mr. Zhao Kuifu put "Meng Changjun's five-nation tour" in the first place?