You can notice that the quality of primary and secondary schools is based on the enrollment rate, especially the enrollment rate of famous schools, but universities are not. Why? Because the purpose of the university is to train professionals, not to prepare for the postgraduate entrance examination, now the postgraduate entrance examination takes five courses, English, politics and mathematics plus two professional courses, while the university has to learn at least 40 courses. If all universities aim at postgraduate training, wouldn't it be better to study five courses and nothing else, four years? One year is enough, two years at most.

Because of this, many people find it easy to take the postgraduate entrance examination. They will learn nothing. They taught themselves five courses and took remedial classes. Enough! So it's easy, but what's the use of the graduate students admitted in this way? Graduate students need to do scientific research, and their major knows nothing but two exams, which is a mixed diploma. Why China can't go into scientific research is a very important reason.

Postgraduate exams need to be reformed, but the threshold is not lowered. On the contrary, people who are eager for quick success and instant benefit and speculate on exams should be thrown out, and college students who are really professional and study hard should be selected. There should be no more people who ask me every day just for the postgraduate entrance examination. Can I take the exam as a sophomore? What should such a person do if he is admitted?