In fact, the key to changing the perfunctory teaching state of university teachers depends on whether the school really needs strict management. Many students tell the truth, there is no way to change the teacher's perfunctory state, because teachers are not afraid of students at all, and it is useless for students to report more reactions. My undergraduate course is an ordinary two schools. To tell the truth, some of our teachers are extremely irresponsible. For example, they just watch some ppt in class. I don't give you content at all. They are more eager to finish class than the students. Many of our students have reported the teacher's teaching situation to the leader, saying that she doesn't speak well and applied for a new teacher. But the dean told us directly that the school was not good and some good teachers would not come at all. It is very difficult to invite them, but I don't think this should be an excuse. We should not be put off by this reason. If a school wants to develop and only let these teachers educate children, I think this school will never develop, so the key to really change this state is that the school should formulate some punishment schemes, such as this teacher, who has no passion in class. The headmaster of the school can send several supervisors to listen to the class at the back to see what his problems are, because the students don't listen well and he perfunctory. Or because of the poor educational environment in the school, he perfunctory, so we must first find the key to the problem, and then solve this matter according to these things. If a teacher really doesn't understand the reform and has been perfunctory in teaching, why should he be dismissed? I think it is very bad not to teach well and get paid for nothing, so can you change the master's state? It depends on whether the school can supervise these perfunctory teachers from a very strict execution.