First of all, it should be clear that "appropriate" socialization is an inevitable and important part of college students' life. We don't deny that socialization plays an irreplaceable role in broadening the circle of friends and knowledge, but "extensive" has all-encompassing and comprehensive significance, and college students have limited time and energy. Too comprehensive social interaction is obviously excessive and does more harm than good. We can't completely deny its advantages, and try to make a fuss on a large scale. In addition, it is necessary to clarify the scope of "socialization". Socializing is more than just making friends. Obviously, expanding the social scope is beneficial to you and easy to grasp.

College students are faced with more social opportunities, that is, more choices and temptations. There is an old saying that it is unrealistic to focus on everything. The result of grasping everything must be that you can't grasp anything tightly, just like the sand in your hand. Grasping too much will only accelerate the loss.

On the issue of attack and defense, I am used to designing problems from the perspective of macro theory and detailed examples, which echo each other. Of course, it would be better if we can grasp the problem according to the scene, but it is a little difficult to be concise and clear.

The summary statement should be written according to the argument, grasp the points raised in the argument and emphasize it again in another way. But what is more important in the summary is to summarize the audience, grasp the problems that appear in the other party's presence, list them clearly, and let the judges agree.

Well, that's about it. I hope it helps you.