Those students who have not been admitted to undergraduate courses or have only attended two or three books in those years still live a colorful life. University is not the only criterion to measure people. Even without a good university, you can get a good job through your own efforts.

First, integrate into society Whether you are admitted to a university or not, whether a good university or a bad university ultimately belongs to the road to work, you need to integrate into the ranks of society. They just study at different times from school, and now they all work at the same time. There is not much difference.

? Second, enjoy life? In my opinion, students who have no undergraduate course or read only two or three books will have less study pressure, enjoy life more and spend most of their time entertaining themselves. In the face of learning from them, I don't regard it as the only one, but I will focus on many hobbies. Even after a long time, I will have such an attitude and will not limit myself to study.

Third, equal treatment? University is not the only criterion to distinguish people, let alone the way to influence everyone's development. As long as you work hard, you will get good development. Those who didn't get into a good university at the beginning have made good development achievements through their own silent efforts to improve their personal abilities. They are also human beings with unlimited potential, which cannot be measured by academic qualifications. In fact, everyone has been on a horizontal line since birth. As for their future life, I believe that as long as they work hard enough, they will get a good development and future, not necessarily a good degree, so their life now is definitely ideal.

Education may be particularly important at some point, but it is not the only criterion to measure people. As long as a person works hard and makes progress, his achievements may be higher than those of his highly educated classmates.