Article 1 (Class _ _ _ _) of the model minutes of the poverty appraisal meeting in universities.
Meeting time: _ _ _ _ _ _
Meeting address: _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Person in charge: _ _ _ _ _ _
Class Committee members: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Student representatives: _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Recorder: _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Meeting content: 1. Establish a national scholarship selection team (randomly selected from students who have never applied for scholarships).
2. The counselor will explain to you the application conditions and matters needing attention of the national grant.
3. Under the guidance of the counselor, the class committee representatives and students discuss each student who enters the database of poor students, and adhere to the principles of fairness, justice and openness.
4. Finally, after many discussions, everyone reached a consistent evaluation result and counted the list.
After discussion by the judging panel, it was finally unanimously passed: xx students applied for state grants.
Appraisal team (signature):
date month year
Minutes of Poverty Appraisal Meeting of University Model Association Part II Time:
Location:
Team leader:
Members:
The identification group of poor students in our class held the identification meeting of poor students in our class on. According to the Questionnaire for Students and Their Families in Colleges and Universities and the Application Form for Identification of Students with Financial Difficulties in Colleges and Universities, the class identification group identified the student as 20xx. Poor students in the 20xx academic year.
Member signature:
date month year
Minutes of University Poverty Appraisal Meeting: Fan Wensan 1, Time:
2. Location:
3. Participants: class teacher, Zhang Xiaoyu, Europe, Zhou, Chang Su Sheng and other class members.
4. The principle of participating in the evaluation: in line with the principle of fairness and justice, carefully examine and approve the application for grants, and consider and inspect the applicant's family background, comprehensive performance at school and other aspects before considering the corresponding amount of grants;
After the competition:
Twenty-three applications were submitted, and only seven places were allocated to this class.
3, after the accreditation panel certification review, determine the seven funding list, and implement the principle of grading review.
(1) family poverty
(2) The family has special circumstances.
(3) the family suffered economic losses because of something.
(4) Good performance in school, no failure this semester.
(5) Unite classmates and love class sports.
3. Comprehensive evaluation: After being certified and evaluated by the evaluation team, the list of seven scholarships will be determined and graded.
First prize list:
Second-class funding list:
Third prize list:
Fourth, the list of temporary difficulties in the class: Cai
The evaluation is as above. If you have any objection to the evaluation results, I hope my classmates and teachers will put forward valuable opinions! ! !
3. Participants: class teacher, xx and other class members.