Informed criticism is actually a combination of two concepts: notification and criticism. "Notice" means that the higher authorities notify the lower authorities or their internal employees of the relevant information in writing. And "criticism" refers to the opinions put forward on shortcomings and mistakes, with the aim of hoping that the other party will learn a lesson and take it as a warning. From this point of view, informed criticism in a broad sense refers to a measure that the subject announces the shortcomings and mistakes of the actor within a certain range, hoping that the actor or others can learn from them and take them as a warning. Here, the subject of informed criticism's implementation is uncertain, which can be a company, an administrative organ or an organization, such as informed criticism, where the party organization violates party discipline.
Classification of notification: There are two main types of informed criticism behaviors implemented by administrative organs: one is that the superior within the administrative organ deals with the subordinate who violates discipline, or the internal supervision department or discipline inspection commission of the administrative organ deals with the violator. At this time, informed criticism is only an administrative punishment. The other is that the administrative organ takes measures to publicize the illegal facts of the violator within a certain range, which damages his reputation and credibility, not only punishing and educating the violator, but also educating others widely. At this time, informed criticism belongs to the category of administrative punishment. In practice, the informed criticism made by drug regulatory authorities to illegal drug-related enterprises belongs to the latter.