Poet's Fu and Poet's Fu —— A Study of Cao Honghan's Fu in Wei and Six Dynasties
Research on Vulgar Fu _ Fu Junlian (Fu Junlian, from Huining County, Gansu Province, 1960,1), doctor of literature, professor of the College of Literature, Northwest Normal University, doctoral supervisor, head of the first-level discipline of "China Language and Literature", and head of the doctoral program of "China Classical Philology". Vice President of China Cifu Society, Vice President of China Fuxi Culture Research Society, Vice President of Gansu Dunhuang Studies Society and Vice President of Gansu Siku Quanshu Research Society. Engaged in the teaching and research of China's ancient literature and China's classical philology, and published academic works such as Notes on Dunhuang Fu School, Research on Characters and Dunhuang Literature Series, and published more than 30 academic papers/kloc-0. )
There is also Mr. Gong, President of China Cifu Society, a scholar who published monographs on Cifu, a famous expert on Cifu culture, an academic leader of Han Fu, a historian of China Cifu, and an authority on China Cifu research. Now he is a famous professor of Shandong University, a professor of editorial department of Shandong University, a doctoral supervisor of ancient literature, honorary chairman of China Cifu Association, honorary director of Institute of Cifu of Shandong University, honorary director of Institute of Cifu of Luoyang University, president of National Cifu Society, president of National Cifu Research Association and academic director of China Youth Ancient Literature Research Association. Top-notch talents in Shandong Province enjoy the special allowance of the State Council, distinguished professor of Luoyang University, general consultant of Lunan Cifu Association, and consultant of Cifu Parallel Network, etc. )
These are the epitomizers of modern Fu studies. If you want to find master fu, it is another school of Xunzi and others.
I don't know if it is useful for you, for your reference. . . joke
Third, the requirements of debate.
1. Yes () is not a three-step method of gathering