First, the difference between a double first-class university and a double first-class discipline. Double first-class disciplines refer to disciplines, and double first-class universities refer to schools. Double-class discipline refers to first-class discipline, which refers to world-class universities and first-class disciplines. First-class discipline belongs to the scope of double-class, but it only refers to disciplines, not schools. Double first-class universities include first-class universities and first-class disciplines, which refers to schools.

World-class universities and world-class disciplines, referred to as "double-class" for short, are important strategic decisions made by * * * * and the State Council, and another national strategy in China's higher education field after "2 1 1 Project" and "985 Project", which is conducive to enhancing the comprehensive strength and international competitiveness of China's higher education.

The first batch of "double first-class" universities 137, including 42 world-class universities (36 A-class and 6 B-class) and 95 world-class disciplines. There are 465 double-class construction disciplines (including 44 self-defined disciplines).

"Double first-class" contains two meanings, namely, building a world-class university and a first-class discipline. So the combination of these two first-class is called "double first-class". It can be seen that "double first-class" is not just a certain university or a certain discipline, but a combination of world-class universities and first-class disciplines.

Second, is a university with two first-class disciplines useful?

Double first-class universities refer to universities with first-class disciplines, so is it useful to build universities with first-class disciplines? Let me analyze it for you.

First of all, there are 70 universities with 2 1 1 and 25 non-universities in the construction of first-class disciplines. It can be seen that the strength of first-class disciplines to build universities is very strong. Although the selection criteria for building universities with first-class disciplines are universities with specific advantages, it does not mean that these universities are weak. It is precisely because of the strength of these universities that they can cultivate superior disciplines.

Secondly, judging from China University's ranking of 202 1, the People's Public Security University of China, which ranks the lowest, is also in the position of 226th, but in fact the overall ranking is not low. There are 60 universities in the top 100 of first-class discipline construction universities, accounting for a considerable proportion, which can also prove the strength of first-class discipline construction universities.

Therefore, it is useful to build universities with first-class disciplines, and most of these universities rank higher. The lowest ranked universities are also in the upper-middle position in the People's Public Security University of China, and each university has its own advantageous disciplines. The educational resources of these subjects are certainly not bad, and their strength is also recognized by the society.