There is no standard answer to this question. Everyone's situation is different, and the answer is actually different, which varies from person to person.
Many students want to take the postgraduate entrance examination, but they are entangled for various reasons. For example, many people will tell you that "animation majors don't need to take the postgraduate entrance examination" and "postgraduate entrance examination is useless". There are also some people who just hold the opposite view that "postgraduate entrance examination is helpful for the future" and "there are more opportunities for postgraduate entrance examination" and so on.
In fact, this is a question of value. Everyone has different values, so his views are different accordingly.
The advice I can give is:
See what your needs are.
Then consider whether the animation postgraduate entrance examination can meet your needs and achieve your goals.
If it is helpful, it is valuable and can be tested.
Have your own rational judgment.
If there is a need to improve academic qualifications, or if there is a tendency to be a teacher or a civil servant in the future, then it is recommended to take the postgraduate entrance examination;
If you don't have any special requirements for academic qualifications and feel that you are more suitable for starting practice and accumulating experience early, then start working early ~
Regarding the question of whether this animated postgraduate entrance examination is worthwhile, Tangxin Deke has sent a lot of related contents and discussions before, which may also inspire you:
Is it necessary for animation major to take the postgraduate entrance examination? From the perspective of "money"
Send money, send a house, send an account to the animation postgraduate entrance examination ... and say that education is useless?
Is the animation professional value of animation postgraduate entrance examination worthy of postgraduate entrance examination?
Is animation major worth into the pit?