I think so, because there are very few college students who really study now, and I am one of them. I think we must reward them, so as to stimulate some people's fighting spirit in learning.

Moreover, in order to develop in an all-round way, universities should not only reward students who study well, but also pay attention to their all-round development, and should not give them scholarships just because they study well.

You can send some bonus funds in many fields, such as sports, because some people don't pay much attention to their health after going to college, while others only pay attention to losing weight, which is unreasonable, so you should do some sports that are beneficial to you, even if the amount is small, which can stimulate your classmates' sports craze.

There is also that learning well does not necessarily mean social practice is good, only learning well can only be called nerd level. These good learners should be encouraged to take part in more practical activities.

Besides her grades, we should also give him a comprehensive ideological and moral evaluation. If a person studies well, but his ideological and moral level is low, it will not work, so it is necessary to comprehensively evaluate a good student.

Just like the "three good students" we said before, the three good students in universities should also follow this standard, which is fairer.

In fact, our university is also based on this standard, but it is still relatively strict. Why do you say this is because there are too few places in this university, so that many hard-working people can't see their achievements.

I have worked hard for a long time but I can't see the results, and who doesn't want their good grades to be seen by others? So it's still hard work. Few people will get that scholarship. I wish there were more places to inspire people behind me to study hard.