Afterwards, with the exposure and forwarding of the video, the school issued a notice stating as follows:
In fact, in my opinion, the behavior of college counselors beating students to collect fees at random is actually divided into three problems:
How to ensure the quality of teachers and why corporal punishment education still exists in colleges and universities?
It is said that teachers are human engineers, hardworking gardeners and students are the flowers of the motherland. However, students are not plants, and you can't let gardeners cut flowers at will ... students are people, living people, with their own dignity and ideas. If the students are really wrong, it doesn't matter, the teacher can be reasonable ... but if you want to use the authority of the teacher to suppress and beat the students, then you don't deserve to be called a teacher at all.
There will be such a situation, and I think the school has certain responsibilities. One is lax supervision, and students feedback that teachers beat students not once or twice. Many people have been beaten by teachers. Even from the video, the teacher beat the students really hard and asked them to queue up to call him ... I don't think the school will be completely unaware of this ... Perhaps, the school thinks that this way can only manage the students well ... As for the life and death of the students, what do the students think of the school? This is the mentality of the school, which does not take students seriously. ...
In fact, schools attach importance to students, and there must be channels for feedback and supervision. For example, students' evaluation of teachers can be divided into excellent, good and poor grades. Teachers' teaching quality can be reflected by students' evaluation. If the teaching quality is too poor, the school needs to investigate whether it is the teacher's problem or the student's problem, so as to carry out teaching better.
How to supervise illegal charges, and why are there illegal charges in university projects?
In fact, any charging items in colleges and universities must be approved and publicized by the price bureau before they can be charged. However, as far as media reports are concerned, such illegal charges are obviously the behavior of some people using their power to directly charge fees.
Now that it has been exposed, the money can indeed be returned or unified fund management, but what if it is not exposed?
Don't worry?
I don't think it should be like this. A school is a place for teaching and educating people. Even colleges and universities must shoulder this responsibility ... but such charging behavior will affect the image of teaching and educating people. Instead, they will be like a peddler who is full of money and just wants to make money.
Therefore, the school should manage it well and can't let such interests collude again. ...
How can the project management of continuing education and training ensure the quality of education instead of becoming a tool for some people to make money?
Now colleges and universities are expanding their enrollment, and many people flock to them when they see the opportunity. In addition, diploma education has become more and more important, and many diploma workshops have also begun to boom. The continuing education and training program in this university is good in nature, which can allow more people to receive continuing education and improve their level and quality. But the management is too chaotic.