Strange questions are not conducive to children's knowledge. In life, many parents will send some strange questions or even digress when guiding their children to do problems, which leads to many children and parents not knowing how to answer them. The following are the strange questions that are not conducive to children's knowledge!
Strange questions are not conducive to children's knowledge 1 This is a very classic so-called "difficult primary school question": (1, 3, 7, 8); (2、4、6); (5, 9), each of the three groups is grouped together because of the same rule. Please tell me this rule. The answer is that the first set of phonetic symbols are all one; The second group of four tones; The third group is three tones.
Rack one's brains to analyze the laws of mathematics, who would have thought it was Pinyin? According to the report of China Youth Daily on June 13, this kind of digression, strange topic and difficult problem that makes children feel embarrassed, parents worry and college students scratch their heads is regarded by teachers as a "treasure book" to exercise their brains and develop their intelligence.
Modern education is student-oriented, inspiring independent thinking and attaching importance to the ability to find problems. There is no unique answer to the question, which gives teachers and students a lot of room for thinking, which is undoubtedly good news for good teachers and active students.
But it is good to do off-topic, strange questions, difficult problems, divergent thinking and creative thinking. We should not only consider the characteristics of knowledge itself, but also consider the cognitive development law and physical and mental characteristics of students. We must consider the acceptance ability of most children, and we must aim at stimulating interest and enthusiasm in learning, and we must not "over-develop".
Just like picking peaches, jumping is enough and inspiring; If you can't jump three times, it will dampen children's enthusiasm and lead some students to regard learning as a fearful road from now on. This may be unexpected for educators who are keen on developing primary school students' thinking.
The problem is that this over-exploitation even started from preschool. Kindergartens, which should be fun-oriented, have been teaching literacy classes and arithmetic problems for a long time, and have started "thinking gymnastics" with high difficulty and high risk.
While losing the joy of childhood, I also lost the fun and hobbies of learning. However, due to the competitive pressure of entering colleges and universities prematurely and excessively, children are "over-exploited".
Because of the disparity in educational resources and the relative shortage of high-quality resources, there is actually a disadvantage in choosing schools from primary school. Let children learn more and develop earlier, so that they have "advantages" and "skills" and become a bargaining chip for "choosing schools". This kind of "over-exploitation" in desperation is really the great sorrow of education.
Strange questions are not conducive to children's knowledge. Two parents who graduated from master's degree couldn't answer a math training question in the fourth grade of primary school. After getting the answer, they shouted "cheated". This topic was later posted on the internet, which attracted criticism from education experts for a while-full of strange questions, which did not help to cultivate children!
Students rest and exercise during recess.
Leng Si felt the same way after reading it: How to give children intellectual problems that can not only stimulate their intelligence, but also help them master strict logical thinking?
A primary school math training problem makes parents feel at a loss, but the answer is speechless.
The original title of this topic is:
Please look at the following three sets of numbers. The first group is 1, 3, 5, 7, 8. The second group 2, 4, 6; The third group is 5, 9.
Excuse me, are these three groups of figures grouped according to the same law? Please find the pattern.
If you haven't seen this question and answer, Lengsi hopes you can take a few minutes to think about it. What is the answer?
There is no need to guess, unless there is a miracle, or you are really a "genius", among 100 parents, no one should be able to answer the correct answer.
The answer is actually this: the first set of numbers is pronounced first, the second set of numbers is pronounced fourth, and the third set of numbers is pronounced third.
Student classroom
Surely you didn't expect such an answer? Is this a surprise? Does this topic seem boring?
At that time, two master's parents in Wuhan later published this strange question on the Internet, which attracted a barrage of education experts. The reason is simple: this is purely boring, and has nothing to do with IQ and EQ!
Why are there off-topic and strange questions in various excellent courses and excellent test questions in primary schools?
Under the examination-oriented education system, all kinds of strange questions, strange questions and difficult problems have become important chips to examine children's achievements.
It is an indisputable fact that students have a heavy academic burden. According to a survey, the average weight of schoolbags of primary school students in China is 3. 5 kg, the average weight of junior high school students' schoolbags is 5. 5 kg, pupils use suitcases, which is a common phenomenon in cities.
Students not only spend a long time in school, but also have less time for physical exercise. On holidays, I was forced to attend make-up classes organized by the school and training classes and interest classes arranged by my parents.
Junior high school students' classroom
In fact, educators are well aware of the dangers of students' heavy academic burden, and there are also ways to reduce the burden on children. However, because the soil of exam-oriented education still exists, the effectiveness of repeated "burden reduction orders" has been diluted by exam-oriented education. Therefore, how to reduce the burden is a technical problem.
How to determine the burden reduction index, how to implement it, and how to supervise accountability, the education department should have thoughtful institutional arrangements.
For example, the so-called weird questions should not appear, whether it is training students or school classes and homework.
Not only primary school homework and test papers, but also many propositions in high school and even college entrance examination have been off topic and strange questions.
Many years of college entrance examination papers have a considerable number of problems. According to the authoritative information of the Ministry of Education, most candidates get zero.
This kind of difficult problem, strange topic and strange question may be good questions, but it is not necessarily good questions for the talent selection examination.
For example, mathematics proposition emphasizes the comprehensive application of mathematics with a good starting point, but students' social cognitive ability must be taken into account.
One year, a math 10 sub-topic in the college entrance examination said that buying fish in the market, what market price, government pricing and so on. But nowadays, how many students go to the market to buy fish? How many parents often go to the market to buy food? Later, according to the data of Beijing education authorities, the average score of Beijing candidates on this issue is only 2 points.
A small classroom for high school students
In addition, in the college entrance examination, some provinces and cities gave white pollution questions in the comprehensive examination papers of science, which is relatively easy for urban candidates who have witnessed this pollution, but it is a problem for rural candidates in remote areas.
There are also "strange questions" in the entrance examination of famous foreign schools, but it is entirely out of the need of running a school.
Cambridge University, Harvard University and other famous international universities have had some "odd problems" in the enrollment problem.
In the entrance examinations of Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard, similar questions will be asked: "If you are a grapefruit, do you want to be seedless or seedless?" "If you were a magpie, what would you like to do?" "Why don't we have an ear in the middle of our face?" "Do you want a novel or a poem?"
However, Leng Si believes that the essence of the problem is not how clever and absurd these problems are, but what kind of school-running ideas and ideas are based on when designing these problems.
There is no doubt that the so-called strange questions in Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard are all based on strict control of admission standards, that is, the proposer clearly knows what kind of students the school wants to recruit and what kind of talents to train.
Comic: Can you make a strange question?
On this basis, Cambridge and Harvard designed flexible test questions. Although some test questions look "weird", they haven't changed since their original school. They just try their best to find the students they want. Persistence will become a tradition and, over time, a school culture.
The school has its own "character", which can not only maintain itself, but also be passed down, so it has been Harvard for 400 years and Cambridge for 800 years.
Leng Si insists that for domestic schools, we should not just stare at the strange topics of Oxford and Cambridge, let alone simply imitate them, but should see the big articles behind the strange topics. This is not as superficial as a few strange questions.