First of all, according to this debate. Accommodation control should be a common management system for college students' dormitories now, and the dormitory management will turn off the lights and turn on the electricity every day. Every time something breaks down in the dormitory, you need to register people waiting for maintenance. And property management should be like the management of a community. If there is anything wrong with the dormitory, just call and someone will fix it right away. No one will interfere in your life.

Generally speaking, accommodation control has existed for a long time and has its own reasons. It shows that the school needs Soviet control more. However, it can't be said that after property management and control, it can't be recognized by more schools in this new identity.

Secondly, as far as college students are concerned, they are not divorced from society, and the school is also a small society. It may be more necessary to exercise their self-care ability like material control, or it may be necessary to have a certain system planning like accommodation control. You may think that accommodation control is not free. After all, college students have grown up and have their own rights. But accommodation control is only the bottom line of the system. For example, turning off the lights at 1 1 does not mean that 1 1 is forced to sleep. It is stipulated that 12 can't enter the dormitory and don't go back without interference. So this is just a bottom line. You just ran a traffic light, there was no accident, and no one was killed. Why did you write a ticket? This is a similar bottom line problem.

In fact, I personally think that accommodation control is more suitable for college students. But ... according to the debate. Property control better expresses his benefits, but accommodation control is not so good. So look at the personal level. That's about it. On second thought, there may be more and better opinions.