First, college students are students first. As students, the most important thing is to study. Although learning also includes many aspects, the most basic thing is the accumulation of classroom knowledge. The cultivation and improvement of various abilities are also based on knowledge accumulation. If we overemphasize the cultivation of ability by extensive social interaction and neglect the accumulation of basic knowledge, we will break the foundation of various abilities and knowledge. Without foundation, ability training and all kinds of affairs, water without a source and wood without a root will not achieve the expected results.
Ask another debater to argue that extensive social interaction will delay study. We socialize extensively, which doesn't mean that we spend all our time socializing extensively. It is really worrying that the other debater adds conditional adverbial clauses to the debate. How do you explain that student cadres wandering in joint student unions and student associations often study very well?
Second, human energy is limited. If they spend too much on socializing, it will definitely affect their study, making their mastery of knowledge unstable and not worth the loss. People's energy is like a cake, the total amount is fixed and limited. People spend a certain amount of energy on everything, because the total amount is fixed, so once people spend too much energy on one thing, they will inevitably reduce the energy invested in other things. To achieve extensive social interaction, a lot of energy and time must be invested, which will inevitably reduce the energy invested in knowledge learning. Without the guarantee of time and energy, the effect of learning will inevitably be affected, making knowledge not firmly mastered, thus shaking the foundation of everything, not worth the candle.
(The other debater mentioned too much again. When did extensive social interaction become excessive social interaction? Another debater said that the advantage is to turn adverbs of degree into excessive, excessive and mixed words, but widely neutral words. How can there be an excessive statement? Three people must have a teacher. The premise is that you know three people. Is it because the other debater is so self-taught behind closed doors? )
Third, without excellent knowledge accumulation, even the best social skills can't make up for it, and the lack of social skills can be made up by excellent knowledge (please demonstrate). Excellent knowledge is the foundation and prerequisite for human development, and social skills are the auxiliary conditions. On the basis of excellent knowledge, if you have good social skills, it is really good for the development of college students. But if the two cannot exist, the first thing to master is knowledge. Because knowledge is the foundation of college students' future development and success, and it is the most essential and powerful weapon to solve problems. The lack of social skills can be made up by excellent knowledge, which is reflected in many scientists, but without the support of knowledge, it is impossible to achieve the goal simply by relying on good social skills.
Another debater told us that it is impossible to socialize without knowledge accumulation. What does this prove? Thus, socialization is very important and beneficial. Why else should the opposing debater socialize when he is ready? What we are completely sure of today is learning and knowledge, but there is no absolute conflict between knowledge and socialization. How did the opposing debater demonstrate? )
To sum up, we believe that the foundation and premise of college students' development is the accumulation of knowledge, and extensive social activities will affect the mastery of knowledge, which will shake the foundation of college students' development. Therefore, we believe that college students' extensive social activities do more harm than good.
On the contrary, the rich and colorful college life gives college students a broader space for activities and frequent social activities besides classroom study. May I ask whether the debater's "three religions and nine streams, evil friends and friends" are also within this scope? Even if you know that you are friends of friends, making friends is obviously a matter of personal judgment, and extensive social contact is only to help you accumulate experience, know the pearl and avoid such people. )
Lenin, the great revolutionary teacher, once said "study, study and study again", but never said "socialize and socialize again"! Today's debate is not about who is more important, socializing or studying. ) Peng, an all-round mathematician, made a speech on "Life is constant struggle" in the last 20 days, but why didn't he say "Life is constant socialization"? Socialization is very important, but people will definitely have more important last words when they die. Is this an argument? ).
When college students socialize widely, they have to deal with society. Modern society is complicated, and interpersonal relationships are even more varied. Where there is sunshine, there will be shadows. College students are psychologically and physically immature and have no social experience. As fledglings, how can we see the other side hidden under some seemingly "kind" appearance with immature eyes (hiding all the time is not the way? Besides, there are still many good people in the world. Can the other debater be sunny?
Criminals in society just take advantage of the immaturity of college students to make friends with them, thus inducing them to commit crimes and making them regret it. It's really shameful to make a mistake. Aren't you sad? In recent years, the crime rate of college students is on the rise. In 2002, it was reported that boys accounted for 85% and girls for 74% of the teenagers who committed crimes due to careless friends. Such an amazing number will not make us sigh where the mother's good child is (because you choked on food, the other party took advantage, and because criminals took advantage, you chickened out? Give up eating because of choking? You are the one who hates the enemy. Come on! )? Where are the pillars of the country?
Third, from a materialistic point of view, there must be a limit to everything, otherwise you will suffer enough. Chemistry tells us that hydrogen can't be friends with air indefinitely, and mathematics tells us that a certain series also has this limit. Life tells us that there is a limit to socializing. Liu Qing said that although the road of life is very long, it is often only a few steps. When it is tight, it is often when people are young.
(Extensive is a neutral word, which never contains excessive meaning. The teacher asked me to study extensively. Should we study scientific and cultural knowledge excessively? Does the teacher let us read extensively so that we can study indefinitely without sleeping at night? To sum up, it fully proves our view that college students' extensive social communication does more harm than good. Thank you.