I think it's nothing. There are professions, and people are stars, not bachelors. Why is there such a double standard? There is no requirement that a star must be literate, an actor can perform a good play and a singer can sing a good song. I think everything will be fine. No one will decide their education level. Of course, it does not rule out that some keyboard players like to cling to other people's problems. This is also an unsolved problem, but as far as I'm concerned, I don't mind that stars are illiterate.

Now this entertainment circle is like this. Many people will arrange the water army to attack the stars who are fiercely competitive with them. Of course, some people really think that stars should have culture. Have there been fewer cases of shame after being exposed in the last two years? Everyone seems to think that literacy is a great artificial design, but this kind of artificial design really can't be installed casually.

Throughout the entertainment circle, there is really culture, and there is really little evidence, because if you are really top student, I think being an actor is a loss. Why not contribute to the country? It is really a waste of talents in the entertainment circle, and as a member of the entertainment circle, the task of a star is actually to make his fans happy in front of the screen and pass on positive energy. What do people with such a high degree want? At most, you need a higher EQ. IQ really doesn't matter much.

To sum up, I really don't care what kind of advanced university I graduated from and how high my education level is. He can make me happy and bring me positive energy.