Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - Why is foreign education more slack than domestic education, but there are more talents in various fields?
Why is foreign education more slack than domestic education, but there are more talents in various fields?
Mainly depends on thinking and creativity. No matter how hard it is, if you don't take the right path, it will be over!

China was great at least until junior high school! People's education is basically equal! There is no obvious difference between higher education and generalist education! It's hard to treat people equally! In foreign countries, the children of private elites attend private schools, which is the devil's education. When they grow up, they are mostly engaged in financial technology, while the public attending public schools is the happy education. When they grow up, most people become workers, and most people can engage in other jobs. Elite education investment, personalized education, top talents output more. Domestic education is the most logarithmic indoctrination teaching, and the devil passes. Top children lose their creativity, while most mediocre children make remarkable progress. To sum up, there are more ordinary talents than top talents in various fields in China. In foreign countries, there are few ordinary talents and a large proportion of top talents.

The elite education abroad from primary school to high school is not easy at all. It's not just going to college that makes you work hard. You see who studies loosely from childhood and will work hard when they get there. Similarly, elite groups are different from ordinary groups. In addition, American universities have harvested rich, powerful and intelligent elites from all over the world. So this part is more prominent. There are two kinds of education abroad, elite education and civilian education. Elite education in private schools is stricter than ours, so strict that even looks and conversation are required, let alone study. This is the education of the upper class, and these people will become the ruling class of society when they come out. Civilian education is the education of public schools, which is the so-called happy education. As long as the children are happy, it doesn't matter whether they learn or not. These children are destined to be at the bottom of society from an early age.

Talents are talents at all times, and talents are only a few. The real talent is not taught by the teacher, what he needs is Bole! What is needed is a high-end platform, and someone needs to invest in it. What we need is to broaden our horizons and have a free research environment!

Our country is not allowed to break the original rules to innovate, because it is illegal and limits the practical ability and imagination of many people. For example, the personal modification in the automobile industry is not good, and where the technology comes from is not the practice of modification again and again. A good education is also a dead book, because it cannot be surpassed. Can I develop guns and ammunition at home and apply for a patent? Can I build a car at home and go on the road?

First education, then industry, can't cutting-edge technology be the standard? In education, American imperialists have never surpassed China in all aspects, but in different ways. As for almost every field, American imperialists, a cutting-edge industry, are indeed ahead of China.

It's not slackness, but different educational ideas. Education abroad is strictly designed, not arbitrary. This design is based on the latest psychology and pedagogy. And many of us can't understand it because we don't have their educational philosophy. The educational gap between China and the West takes a hundred years to calculate, which is much larger than that of general natural science.

Talent is made up of people. People follow human nature, and human nature pursues profit. Where the profits are, people will go, and the talents trained by China will also go to the US imperialists. Modern education in China is in step with that in Britain. They have never fallen behind, but they have no money and few people participate. It's been 20 years since comprehensive university education was expanded, but it's ridiculous to let children stay in school for a few more years in order to reduce the pressure of employment. Everything is money, and money can be transformed into anything, even time. If Einstein thinks about how to eat enough every day, his academic time will be greatly reduced, understand?

There are not many top scientists educated in America. Newton was an Englishman, Einstein was an ox, and then he went to America. Yang Zhenning intends to communicate with other great people in America. Therefore, money comes first, and it is unrealistic to train cattle people. It can only be said that we still learn from the mature experience of the west (compulsory education), and foreign primary and secondary schools are still relatively loose, because as long as they are not very bad, they can go to college. Since university, our students are completely different from those abroad. It may be said that it is difficult for us to enter the university after reviewing for the college entrance examination, but it is easy to mix a diploma and the world after entering, but it is easy to enter the university abroad, but it is difficult to get a diploma. At that time, children will be more mature psychologically and want to study hard. The difference between Chinese and foreign education may be the difference between active learning and passive understanding. There are always people who think that there is a big difference between foreign countries and domestic countries. Ordinary people are no different except political form. Ordinary people are rushing for three meals a day, and those who have no money are also laughed at and looked down upon by the rich. The same is true of education. Rich people can only use money to learn a basic course and various so-called interest classes. Public knowledge in China will not tell you that there is no free lunch, including knowledge. Knowledge also needs money to buy.

As far as the current education mode is concerned, China's education can make the whole people popularize scientific knowledge and create the largest labor force group that can meet the needs of modern industries. The cultivation of high-end talents may not be as good as that of the West, but fortunately, our talent base is large and we can gain a foothold in the first echelon. And the west? Happy education? The result is a serious polarization, as long as a small number of talented people can become talents and these people are very creative. This is the inevitable result of two different educational systems.