European and American countries (the United States, Britain) all belong to relatively open education, that is to say, teachers will not give students too much pressure, teach a wide range of things, are not rigid, and pay more attention to reading, extracurricular practice and practical ability. It is also important for teachers to guide students and let them explore and learn by themselves.

Asian countries (Korean, Japanese, China) belong to relatively closed education, and now students can experience the workload and extracurricular tutoring, but their knowledge is relatively narrow. They are asked to recite a lot of ancient poems, but they don't pay much attention to reading. Even in the third grade, they are forbidden to read extracurricular books. Teachers are cramming education to students, and they don't pay attention to team extracurricular practical activities.

As for good or bad:

If all students are divided into upper and lower classes, then the education system in Europe and America is more suitable for the upper class, while the education system in Asian countries is more suitable for the lower class.

If the whole learning process is divided into two parts, then the education system in Europe and America is suitable for the second part, and the education system in Asia is more suitable for the first part.