Theoretically, a zero-violence environment will be more conducive to children's growth. However, people should know that this problem is not a purely theoretical one, but a realistic one.

"Zero violence" is only a hypothesis, but in fact, many people grow up well in the environment of non-zero violence, but this does not prove that non-zero violence is a necessary factor to promote human growth.

Education is a complex system problem, and there is no applicable theory or formula. Every parent should carry out personalized and targeted education according to the situation of his family. On this issue, the most important thing is whether parents can carry out effective education according to the laws of education, causality and children's situation.

This is just an ideal environment with little violence, which can be equivalent to zero violence.

Children who grow up in a less violent environment are psychologically healthier and theoretically more emotional; However, just like a patient living in a "sterile cabin", even if he is well, his immunity needs to be gradually restored. If he suddenly comes into contact with the outside world, he will inevitably return to the hospital for treatment because of infection.

By the same token, a child who grew up in a zero-violence environment will not be able to integrate into the society because of his lack of immunity to "violence" when he enters a normal society with complex violence factors!

It is a "wolf child" phenomenon that does not have human "social attributes"!

Parents who create a zero-violence parenting environment are essentially doting on their children! Just like parents who raise their children with the concept of "cleanliness", they all have different degrees of obsessive-compulsive disorder! It is an act that harms children's physical and mental health! It is not conducive to the development of children's mind and sound personality! Children who grow up in this environment can't go far!

Parents who have that idea and put it into action are inhuman and harmful to their children's physical and mental health. Society should resist this phenomenon!

Everything has two sides, and nothing is absolute! So I think this is just an ideal state.

Giving children a zero-violence environment is what parents expect, but the reality does not exist. Why do you say that? Look at the following analysis:

The family provides a zero-violence living environment for children. Some children around me have been patiently taken care of by their parents since birth. From the child's birth to the child's kindergarten, the family never yelled at the child, and there would be no beating of the child. It is reasonable that such children are very happy and happy! But in fact, the child is very introverted, afraid to play with other children, always playing alone, and sometimes other children talk loudly, which will make her cry. What's the explanation?

There is no such thing, because you can provide her with a zero-violence living environment at home, but she always has to contact the outside society and life groups! Not all children are so polite. When they meet a Xiong Haizi who has a big temper and is spoiled by his family, he is the victim!

So! If you can't let your child live under your wings all the time, don't draw a circle for her in the name of love and separate from other children!

After all, people live in groups, and we have to meet different people in our lives!

This question is like "Will a child grow up healthier in a sterile environment?"

The answer is obvious, no.

Since we are environmental animals, the real environment is most beneficial to us. Our psychology is also set to adapt to the real environment.

Violence is as harmful as bacteria.

But who can say that there are no germs around you?

As long as the environment is not wrong, our psychological adaptability is still quite strong.

It is worth noting that "verbal violence" is usually more destructive to psychology than the obvious harmful behavior of "violence".

[Cheng Yun's Mind] Founder ~ Trough laity √.