In the Qing dynasty, the prince entered school and sat face to face with the master. The master read a sentence, the prince read a sentence, and an article was repeated hundreds of times. However, the full-fledged owner does not have this right. They must stand in the classroom when the prince is sitting. I'm sure Master Meng Man must have felt very wronged at that time.
In fact, this regulation is related to Yong Zhengdi. After Yong Zhengdi ascended the throne, China intellectuals were reused, and the masters of Chinese studies could be employed. Princes respect their Chinese teacher very much and study together for a long time, which cultivates the friendship between teachers and students. After Emperor Jiaqing ascended the throne, his master became his right-hand man, and he listened to his master. After his master died, he walked farewell and mourned his master all the way.
In the late Qing Dynasty. Weng Xin, the master of Emperor Tongzhi, had a son who fled without fighting when guarding the city. He was a deserter and was impeached by Zeng Guofan to the court. The imperial court ministers discussed the decision, but out of the affection between teachers and students, Emperor Tongzhi changed his decision to be sent into exile and let Weng Xu's son escape death. Do you think it's still good to be the master of the prince, and you can save your life at the critical moment?